|
|
Michigan Home Mortgage Market Analysis
July 18th, 2010
Everyone online is suddenly a real estate or mortgage expert. How do you verify that they really are what they claim?
You’re looking for a home and/or mortgage, so you’ve started your search online like over 70% of consumers.
There’s so much information, it’s overwhelming.
A simple search like, “Birmingham Michigan Mortgage Rates“, returns 180,000 results!
How do companies and individuals stand out in that big of a crowd?
They all compete to be on the first page of Google as over 90% of those searching Google don’t look further than that.
Does being on the first page of Google mean that company/person is an actual expert or the best one to call?
Not by any means.
All a high Google ranking MAY imply is that:
- that company/person has put out enough content to be noticed by Google. That doesn’t mean it’s good content though!
- the high ranking company/person hired a company to post content for them and do other things to manipulate them to the top – they’ve basically bought there way there.
So how can someone searching the web be sure their search leads them to the right expert?
Read the content associated with the company/person your search leads you to!
- Once you do that, several patterns emerge:
- You’ll see real estate agents that only post listings for sale.
- Other agents may only post sales data.
- Many lenders and loan officers only post interest rates.
- Too many basically just brag about how good they are.
True experts, the one’s you should hire, will show their expertise by doing more than the above.
Think about it this way, you don’t need a real estate agent to find homes advertised online for sale. Information is also readily available online about sales data and trends. Same goes for interest rates.
As I pointed out with the 180,000 search results for “Birmingham Michigan Mortgage Rates“, that’s way too much data to interpret. That’s what you need an expert for.
A true expert will assist you in efficiently and logically understanding what the data means for your situation – whether buying or selling real estate or looking for a purchase or refinance mortgage.
Keep all this in mind the next time you search online for anything.
Experts earn that title, they don’t buy it.
BTW – as I’m considered an expertin my field and use that earned title to improve my Google rankings, I encourage you to check out my blog, website and fanpage to determine for yourself if I’m worthy of being called an “expert“:)
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Posted in Certified, Expert, blogposts | No Comments
July 13th, 2010
What are Michigan homeowners and homebuyers waiting for?
Check out this chart, compliments of my friendly neighborhood First American Title rep, Julia Halpin:)

Gadzooks & zounds! These historically low mortgage rates are record setters.
What more could a Michigan homeowner looking to refinance or a Michigan homebuyer looking to buy ask for?
How about appraisals coming in higher & a job to qualify to buy!
These historically low mortgage rates are a sign that our economy is not doing all that well:(
But, if your home can appraise or you do have a job, it’s a fantastic time to get a mortgage!
So, give our team a call.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Posted in Affordability, Purchase, Rates, Recovery, Refinance | No Comments
July 11th, 2010
On July 30, 2008 President Bush signed into law the Secure And Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (SAFE). The first time Loan Originators (LO) have been required to be licensed at the federal level.
The act is meant to enhance consumer protection and reduce mortgage fraud.
The act requires states to license Loan Originators by:
- Passing a written qualified test
- Complete pre-licensure educational courses
- Take annual continuing education courses
- Having LO’s allow their credit to be checked
- Submitting LO fingerprints to the NMLS for criminal background checks via the FBI
The licensing and registration started in 2009.
So how are loan officers doing with the required testing?
NMLS released the following statistics as of June 30, 2010:

What stands out is that 71% of LO’s so far pass the national component part of the test on their first try and 80% pass the state component. That’s a pretty good number.
On the other hand, only 44% of those that retake the test pass the national component. That’s horrible!
What’s this mean?
Well if you take into account that the test really doesn’t change that much on the subsequent retakes it could mean any of the following:
- those retaking the test do poorly with tests
- they’re not very good at studying
- they have no idea what they’re doing to begin with
It’s estimated that the NMLS requirements have led to over half the LO’s to leave the mortgage business in the past year.
Of course, the economy has played a large role in that also.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Expert, fraud, Michigan, Mortgage, nmls. test Posted in Certified, Expert, Fraud, Government, Licensing | No Comments
July 10th, 2010
Well Congress finally got their act together on something.
Both the House & Senate approved a bill to allow homebuyers with purchase contracts dated by April 30, 2010 to close on their transactions until September 30, 2010. The bill is now on its way to President Obama to be signed into law.
Why the extra time?
According to the National Association of Realtors, approximately 180,000 homebuyers would lose out on the credit as they can’t close by the current June 30th deadline.
NAR blames backed up lenders, delays in Flood Insurance and the Rural Development programs and new construction issues as the primary reasons homebuyers can’t close.
Here’s NAR’s 180,000 list broken down by state:
Alabama, 2,590; Alaska, 830; Arizona, 5,440; Arkansas, 2,090; California, 17,700; Colorado, 3,390; Connecticut, 1,770; Delaware, 400; District of Columbia, 300; Florida, 14,830; Georgia, 6,270; Hawaii, 710; Idaho, 1,270; Illinois, 7,030; Indiana, 3,560; Iowa, 2, 030; Kansas, 1,840; Kentucky, 2,540; Louisiana,1,800; Maine, 840; Maryland, 2,630; Massachusetts, 3,930; Michigan, 6,470; Minnesota, 3,760; Mississippi, 1,530; Missouri, 3,600; Montana, 760; Nebraska, 1,110; Nevada, 3,800; New Hampshire, 690; New Jersey, 4,300; New Mexico, 1,160; New York, 9,190; North Carolina, 4,890; North Dakota, 460; Ohio, 8,510; Oklahoma, 2,760; Oregon, 2,090; Pennsylvania, 5,830; Rhode Island, 500; South Carolina, 2,460; South Dakota, 500; Tennessee, 3,910; Texas, 15,340; Utah, 1,130; Vermont, 400; Virginia, 3,890; Washington, 3,190; West Virginia, 940; Wisconsin, 2,690; and Wyoming, 390.
What about all the buyers that have contracts on short sales?
Short sale can easily take 4 months or longer to close. So, if a homebuyer entered into a purchase contract in April, there’s a very low chance they would be able to close by the current June 30th deadline.
A good portion of short sales will be lucky to be able to close by the soon-to-be extended deadline of September 30th.
Now if only Congress could get its act together on the Flood Insurance issue…
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Credit, Expert, extension, Michigan, Mortgage, tax Posted in First Time Buyer, Housing Tax Credit, Purchase, Real Estate Sales, Recovery, Tax Credit | No Comments
June 24th, 2010
Wow!
FNMA is moving faster than bureaucratic red tape for a change.
June 23, 2010, FNMA released announcement SEL-2010-08 outlining changes to penalize homeowners that can afford their mortgages, but choose Strategic Default and walk-away from their mortgage responsibilities.
FNMA’s announcement references the overtures they released in April 2010 in SEL-2010-05 to offer struggling homeowners options other than foreclosure – short sale, deed-in-lieu and loan modification.
FNMA is also threatening strategic defaulters with legal action to pursue them and recoup losses due to foreclosure in states that allow deficiency judgments.
These changes are to take effect in October 2010.
There are a lot questions that come to mind regarding this aggressive stance by FNMA.
1. How in the world are they going to determine why a homeowner lost their home to foreclosure?
I would imagine they’ll require lenders to request more documentation from borrowers that have a prior foreclosure when they apply for their next mortgage to show they didn’t do a strategic default.
2. What happens if a homeowner tries loan modification, short sale or deed-in-lieu, but their lender won’t cooperate and forces them into foreclosure?
The only thing I can think of is homeowners are going to have to keep records of their attempts. What will qualify as acceptable proof is anybody’s guess at this point.
3. That brings up another question – where are the penalties for lenders that basically force homeowers into foreclosure by losing their loan modification, short sale & deed-in-lieu paperwork and generally make the process a nightmare for homeowners?
Come on FNMA – what’s good for the goose is good for the gander!
4. How is FNMA going to pursue strategic defaults and collect on them?
Last I looked, FNMA didn’t have debt collectors on staff. If they did, mabe they should be going after the millions in bonuses paid to their previous executives that cooked the books. Fair is fair, right? Is FNMA going to call in the FBI? Can they cooperate with the IRS to pursue collection? FNMA is now owned by the government and taxpayers can’t default on government debt. Wouldn’t that be a nightmare – the IRS pursuing you to collect on your defaulted mortgage balance!
5. How much extra is this going to cost borrowers?
Every time the government passes more regulation on the mortgage industry, it gets more expensive for borrowers. It will take longer to document the reasons for foreclosure, slowing down the approval process and costing lenders more time which they will pass on to borrowers somehow.
6. How much will this cost taxpayers?
We’re already bailing out FNMA & FHLMC and it hasn’t stopped as they keep losing money. It’s going to cost more to pursue collections. Will they collect enough to offset that additional costs? Oh wait, they’re owned by the government now and since when is government worried about how much it spends?
7. Will FNMA be going after companies that strategically default on their loans?
Again, fair is fair. FNMA also makes loans to companies that buy apartment buildings. There are a lot more foreclosures in that arena also. Where’s the announcement to get tougher on companies that choose strategic default to rid themselves of a money losing property?
Now don’t misunderstand me, I’m not happy that my tax dollars go to prop up FNMA/FHLMC because they’re losing money due to foreclosures – a growing percentage from strategic defaults.
I dealt with a doctor last year that walked awayfrom his home because he was upset about it being upside down. Since he was retiring, he simply bought a “second home” in San Diego and let his home in Novi go to foreclosure. Didn’t even try a short sale.
You can do what you want morally and legally, but he had more than enough to cover what he would have had to bring to a closing.
My real concern is question #2 above. If FNMA wants to encourage homeowners to pursue foreclosure alternatives, what are homeowners to do if lenders fail to assist them?
The whole HAMP (loan modification) process is a joke, despite the millions thrown at it. Banks simply don’t want to do them.
Short sales are slowly improving, but when it still takes an average of 3-6 months to complete them, how does FNMA expect that to be a realistic option?
I totally understand why FNMA is doing this, but fear the execution and consequences have not been thought through.
More Details about the Announcement
Here’s FNMA’s Press Release:
WASHINGTON, DC – Fannie Mae (FNM/NYSE) announced today policy changes designed to encourage borrowers to work with their servicers and pursue alternatives to foreclosure. Defaulting borrowers who walk-away and had the capacity to pay or did not complete a workout alternative in good faith will be ineligible for a new Fannie Mae-backed mortgage loan for a period of seven years from the date of foreclosure. Borrowers who have extenuating circumstances may be eligible for new loan in a shorter timeframe.
“We’re taking these steps to highlight the importance of working with your servicer,” said Terence Edwards, executive vice president for credit portfolio management. “Walking away from a mortgage is bad for borrowers and bad for communities and our approach is meant to deter the disturbing trend toward strategic defaulting. On the flip side, borrowers facing hardship who make a good faith effort to resolve their situation with their servicer will preserve the option to be considered for a future Fannie Mae loan in a shorter period of time.”
Fannie Mae will also take legal action to recoup the outstanding mortgage debt from borrowers who strategically default on their loans in jurisdictions that allow for deficiency judgments. In an announcement next month, the company will be instructing its servicers to monitor delinquent loans facing foreclosure and put forth recommendations for cases that warrant the pursuit of deficiency judgments.
Troubled borrowers who work with their servicers, and provide information to help the servicer assess their situation, can be considered for foreclosure alternatives, such as a loan modification, a short sale, or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. A borrower with extenuating circumstances who works out one of these options with their servicer could be eligible for a new mortgage loan in three years and in as little as two years depending on the circumstances. These policy changes were announced in April, in Fannie Mae’s Selling Guide Announcement SEL-2010-05.
Here’s FNMA’s updated foreclosure table:
| Derogatory Event |
Current Waiting Period
Requirements |
New Waiting Period
Requirements |
| Foreclosure |
5 years
Additional requirements apply after 5 years up to 7 years
|
7 years
No additional requirements apply
|
| Exceptions to Waiting Period for Extenuating Circumstances |
| Foreclosure |
3 years
Additional requirements after 3 years up to 7 years:
Purchase, principal residence with maximum LTV ratio of lesser of 90% or maximum per the Eligibility Matrix
Limited cash-out refinance, all occupancy types, LTV ratios per the Eligibility Matrix |
3 years
Additional requirements after 3 years up to 7 years:
Lesser of 90% LTV ratio or maximum per the Eligibility Matrix
Purchase, principal residence
Limited cash-out refinance, all occupancy types |
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!
“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: deed-in-lieu, fnma, foreclosure, loan modification, short sale, strategic default, walkaway Posted in Deed-in-Lieu, Deficiency Judgment, FNMA, Foreclosure, Loan Modifications, Short Sale, Upside Down, Walk away | No Comments
June 20th, 2010
The lending world just keeps getting tougher.
As of June 1, 2010 FNMA guidelines now require lenders to pull a new credit report right before closing a loan in addition to the credit report pulled at application.
This new required practice will take some time for homebuyers and industry professionals to get used to. Unfortunately, it’ll become more common for purchase transactions to fall apart at the last minute.
How?
Let’s say a homebuyer barely has the credit score required to qualify for their mortgage. They get pre-approved for a conforming mortgage, find a home they like, sign a purchae contract and apply for their mortgage. So far, so good. Then, sometime during the approval process, they innocently charge a tank of gas for their car on a credit card. That small transaction could drop their credit score enough to kill their deal.
Or a homebuyer could go out and open a new account at Best Buy and purchase their new appliances ahead of time. The additional credit payments could exceed the debt tolerance they were initially approved for and again kill their transacation at the last minute.
The least controllable situation – the new credit report pulled before closing discloses something a homebuyer did BEFORE they even applied for their mortgage. It’s easy to forget that information can take up to 90 days to appear on a credit report. So, an innocent credit transaction leading to an increased balance could pop up and kill a transaction.
So homebuyers need to be VERY prudent about what they do with their credit when buying a home. Here are some tips:
- Turn in all your credit card statements from the last 90 days when applying for a mortgage.
- Review your credit report with your Loan Officer and compare what’s reported to what’s on your credit card statements.
- Consider paying down account balances where there’s a discrepency.
- Disclose any recent new credit accounts opened or large charges.
- If you’re credit is borderline, consider an FHA mortgage (which isn’t requiring the additional credit pull yet)
- Be very careful with the use of credit accounts before the closing of your home purchase.
Real estate agents also need to be more aware of this new requrement and start educating homebuyers about it as soon as they start showing them homes. There will definitely be transactions affected, but throwing a temper tantrum and making the problem 100% the lender’s fault will not solve anything. Be professional and part of the solution, not part of the problem!
I do not wish that ugly situation on anyone and I’m dreading when it occurs on one of my transactions.
A more in depth explanation of the new requirement

It’s important to note that FNMA hasn’t come out and required lenders to pull new credit reports right before closing. What they’ve done is introduce a new requirement called, “Loan Quality Initiative” (LQI) and that is forcing lenders to take this action to meet the LQI requirements.
Here’s the language from FNMA leading to lenders pulling new credit reports right before closings:
Lender must determine that borrower liabilities incurred up to, and concurrent with, closing are disclosed and evaluated in qualifying the borrower for the loan.
Why is FNMA doing this? Well here’s as excerpt from FNMA’s announcement 2010-03 about LQI released February 26th that supposedly explains why:
Historically, many issues related to compliance with Fannie Mae selling policies are not detected until after loans are delinquent or through the foreclosure process. Loan repurchase requests to lenders have increased in the past three years, highlighting the need for an improved approach for working with lenders to deliver loans that meet Fannie Mae’s underwriting and eligibility guidelines. Fannie Mae conducted an extensive analysis to determine the primary drivers of repurchase requests and is launching the Loan Quality Initiative (LQI) to identify and implement policy, process, and technology enhancements to improve the compliance with underwriting and eligibility guidelines and mitigate repurchase risk.
Working with its lender partners, Fannie Mae is implementing the LQI enhancements to promote improved loan delivery data that is complete, accurate, and fully reflective of the terms of the mortgage. The LQI will also help ensure that the loan meets the credit and eligibility standards, pricing guidelines, and other requirements of the Selling Guide or negotiated variances. A primary focus is on capturing critical loan data earlier in the process and validating it before, during, and immediately after loan delivery.
This updated approach is designed to stand the test of time across market cycles and risk tolerances, thus supporting market stability and reducing investor and lender risk. Changes introduced under the LQI are intended to reduce repurchase requests through improved data integrity and consistent and early feedback on policy compliance while maintaining the current business model of relying on lenders to make appropriate decisions in accordance with Fannie Mae’s guidelines.
The announcement actually covers a lot more items than just pulling new credit before closings.
Lenders now also have to:
- Confirm the identity of all borrowers
- Verify all borrowers have a valid social security number
- Verify a borrower intends to owner occupy a property
- Validate all parties to a transaction and make sure they’re not on any government exclusion lists
- Reporting & validation of mortgage insurance coverage
- Credit scores must be 620 or higher (with some exceptions)
- ..and more.
FNMA’s vagueness about LQI caused such an uproar in the industry that they had to release a clarification statement March 29th.
Oh but wait, it get’s better! Because their bureaucratic mumbo jumbo is so clear, FNMA had to publish additional clarifying statements on April 7th and again on June 7th.
FNMA has also created an index page on their website to assist lenders with understanding what they’re after.
Is it any wonder why it’s seems so difficult to get approved for a mortgage these days?
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: approval, closing, Credit, Expert, fico, Mortgage, Purchase, score Posted in Credit, FICO Scores, FNMA, Mortgage, Pre-Approval, Purchase | No Comments
June 12th, 2010
Have you been watching mortgage rates over the last few weeks in Michigan?
They’ve touched on record lows. Take a look at this graph of Mortgage Backed Security prices – where higher prices mean lower rates:

The chart above shows the market over the last 2 years. Michigan Mortgage Rates for borrowers have pretty much hit record lows again, subject to daily fluctuations.
So where are all the homebuyers?
Mortgage applications have dropped for three straight weeks and housing sales have turned down a bit.
Michigan Homebuyers may have been spoiled by the Homebuyer Tax Credit, but might want to get past it.
Figure out a monthly payment you can comfortably afford, as now is not the time to stretch your budget.
Then go out a find a house! With record low mortgage rates and the drop in housing prices, you may never find a time homes are more affordable than today!
So, what’s your excuse now?
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Expert, Michigan, Mortgage, Rochester, Royal Oak, Troy Posted in First Time Buyer, Housing Tax Credit, Michigan, Mortgage, Purchase, Rates | No Comments
June 5th, 2010
Today I got a referral from a past client and had to do some damage control on some of the misinformation the couple’s buyer’s agent had filled their heads with.
The issue – the agent had told them that because mortgage interest is tax deductible, their $1,000 rent payment compared to a $1500 house payment.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
I can only assume the agent was implying that they were in a 33% tax bracket to make that claim. The buyers were never asked that information.
The bigger issue though was that the agent clearly had no understanding about how the mortgage interest tax deduction works. They were just abusing a sales technique they’d picked up somewhere and never really learned about.
What did I have to clear up? Well let’s take a look.
Assume the $1500 PITI breaks down like this:
P&I - $1,125
Property Tax - $300
Home Insurance – $75
This about works out for a 5% interest rate on a $210,000 loan. Let’s ignore down payment & PMI for this example though.
Now intially this sounds like a fantastic deal. Can’t you just hear the buyers, “wow honey, instead of paying $1,000 for this apartment, we can buy a $210,000 house for the same payment using the mortgage interest tax deduction!”
Well unfortunately, that’s not even close to the real story.
Here’s how the numbers actually work out.
The first year’s interest on the mortgage above would be approximately $10,430. The annual property taxes would be $3600.
So the total ELIGIBLE for deducting on Schedule A of the 1040 would be $14,030.
Now the agent in question would probably say that since the buyers were in a 33% tax bracket, they could write off, and thereby save, $14,030 x 33% = $4630.
Not true!
Look at the image of Page 2 of the 1040 tax return below:

Notice that the “Married Filing Jointly” Standard deduction in the left column of the page is $11,400.
Line 40 of the 1040 states, “ (from Schedule A) or your standard deduction Itemized deductions”. So you would enter the higher number on line 40.
What this means is that the buyers get an $11,400 tax deduction whether they own a home or not!
The only time you’d put your Schedule A total on line 40 would be if it exceeded $11,400.
So the couple’s actual benefit from owning the home in this example would only be:
$14,030 – $11,400 = $2,630 x 33% = $867
A drastic difference from what their agent had ignorantly misled them with.
I’ve seen mortgage people make a version of this mistake also by telling clients, “that 5% interest rate is really 3.35% after taking into account your 33% tax bracket.” (that’s 5% x (1-0.33))
Keep in mind that our example was based on a $210,000 mortgage. I’ve heard agents using this same technique on deals under $100,000 – where the buyer wouldn’t realize any additional tax savings whatsoever.
The true professionals in our industry really need to know the facts about tax deductions to avoid making any misleading statements.
The best way to handle this tax issue is for buyers to take the tax deduction savings issue up with their CPA. If you don’t have a CPA, contact me for a referral!
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Expert, Homebuyer, Michigan, Mortgage, Rochester, Royal Oak, Tax Deduction, Troy Posted in Affordability, Expert, First Time Buyer, Tax Deduction | No Comments
May 31st, 2010
Previously I wrote a series of posts on Short Sale Legal Issues Affecting Real Estate Agents, which can be found at: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5 & Solutions.
There were several comments and questions on what affects buyers when they’re pursuing the purchase of a short sale. As it’s a very important topic also, I did some research and have written this post.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
Just about every buyer currently in the market for a home, seems to want to “steal a deal”. With all the foreclosures and distressed sellers, it sometimes seems like buyers are in a frenzy to get a deal – just like sharks when there’s blood in the water.
While at first glance a short sale may seem like an easy way to buy a home at a great price, there are several issues that can turn a buyer’s dream into a nightmare.
Let’s take a look at some of the challenges short sale buyers should be aware of and what buyers can do to protect themselves:
•1. Short Sale transactions usually take 3-4 months to close – or longer.
It is not uncommon for a short sale transaction to fall apart because a buyer gets tired of waiting for a closing date. The seller’s lender(s) don’t care about purchase contract dates and when a buyer wants to move. They have little to no incentive to move faster than they want to. It’s important to understand that not only is a seller negotiating with their lender(s) to accept less than what is owed, a seller may also be negotiating to avoid a deficiency amount or a 1099-C. If the seller doesn’t get what they want, they may choose to go the foreclosure route instead of short sale.
SOLUTION: Buyers should make sure they have a time-based out clause in their purchase contract so they can terminate the deal, with no penalties, if it drags on too long.
•2. Making an offer through the real estate agent representing the seller.
Many buyers see a property they like and contact the agent that has their name on the “for sale” sign. Many buyers don’t realize that agent represents the interests of the seller, not the buyer. Several states allow agents to represent both a seller and a buyer, called “dual agency”, but there’s little oversight of agents working in this capacity. I’m also unsure of how an agent that has a commission at stake (paid by the seller), can effectively represent both sides of a transaction without leaning one way over the other. It’d be like an attorney representing both the defendant and the plaintiff in a court case. Would you trust an attorney to do that for you?
SOLUTION: A buyer should either hire their own real estate agent and make sure they sign a buyer’s agency disclosure or hire an attorney to review a purchase contract BEFORE they sign it. A buyer could seek maximum protection and do both.
•3. Determining what to offer on a property listed for short sale.
Did you know that many short sales are still listed at too high of a price? By default, many lenders require a seller to initially list their property at close to what is owed on it. It doesn’t matter that the actual market value of the property may be substantially less. The lender wants to make sure they recoup as much of their loan as possible. Inexperienced and unprofessional real estate agents list properties at these high prices just to get business. Eventually they know they’ll be able to reduce the price and get a sale.
SOLUTION: Buyers should work with a very savvy agent that knows the market and researches a property’s value before writing an offer to avoid overpaying. The agent should also be able to go over their methodology and comparables for determining what to offer. NOTE: if a buyer’s using a mortgage to acquire a property, the appraisal process will usually (but not always) protect the buyer from overpaying. The problem – it may take months for the buyer to find that out.
•4. A Seller’s Disclosure Statement may be worthless on a short sale transaction.
Many states require a seller to attest in writing about the condition of their property. This is meant to prevent sellers from lying about pre-existing conditions like mold, water leaks, plumbing problems, etc. If a seller lies, they can be sued in court by the buyer to recover damages. The problem on a short sale is that the seller is often desperate to sell and may not be entirely truthful. A buyer could try to sue if they find an issue after closing, but most sellers of short sales have no assets to go after.
SOLUTION: Be sure to get an inspection, contact the city about work done at the property, if possible, speak with the neighbors to see if they’re aware of any issues with the property. A home warranty may also be advisable, just make sure to go over exactly what it will & won’t cover.
•5. The condition of a short sale property is often questionable.
People sell properties on short sales because they either can’t afford them or the property is upside down. In either case, a seller may often stop maintaining the property and let it deteriorate.
SOLUTION: Hire the best home inspector possible and don’t scrimp on inspection costs. Be prepared for unpleasant surprises.
•6. The seller’s lender(s) may not allow them to pay normal transaction costs.
A seller usually pays for a title policy to guarantee to the buyer they’ll get the property free of any liens or encumbrances. There may also be attorney fees, transfer taxes and more. In an effort to recoup as much of their loan as possible, a lender may ask a buyer to sign an addendum requiring the buyer to pay these costs.
SOLUTION: Make sure to read everything and ask your agent a lot of questions before signing a purchase contact or any addendums from a lender. Consider hiring an attorney to review documents before signing them.
•7. Spending money on inspections, mortgage application fees & appraisals.
Once a purchase contract is signed, a buyer usually only has so many days to get the property inspected and start the mortgage application process. A buyer could easily spend over $1,000 and then months later have the seller’s lender not approve the short sale amount.
SOLUTION: Ultimately, there isn’t a good solution for this challenge. Inspection fees have to be paid to protect a buyer from purchasing a “lemon”. A buyer will have to apply for a mortgage to start that process. The only item a buyer may be able to avoid throwing money away on is the appraisal. A clause can be added to the purchase contract stating something like, “buyer will have 30 days to close transaction from approval date of seller’s lender(s)”. This will allow the appraisal to be ordered only once the deal is approved.
•8. Many lenders (for the sellers) reserve the right to change their terms up until closing.
It’s not uncommon for a seller’s lender to have a clause in one of their addendums giving them the right to change the terms of their agreement at anytime up until the closing date. They could ask for more money, change the closing date or ask the seller to sign a promissory note for the balance owed.
SOLUTION: There really is nothing that can be done to contractually bind a seller’s lender to terms for the buyer. The buyer has no say in the negotiations between the seller and their lender(s).
•9. Obtaining proper title insurance and clearing up title issues.
Sellers not paying their mortgages, probably also stopped paying other housing related items. Besides mortgage lien issues with the seller’s lender(s), there may also be liens from associations, contractors, back taxes, etc. There may even be real estate investors on title. There have been many instances of title companies working solely on behalf of a short sale agent or real estate investor. Title insurance policies may be comprised in these cases.
SOLUTION: Make sure the title company is representing the buyer fairly. Hiring an attorney may be a good idea for the buyer. Many states also allow “split closings” where the buyer (or their agent) may select their own title company – which will assist in making sure the seller’s title company does what they’re supposed to.
•10. Condition of the property upon possession.
In a more normal transaction, it’s not uncommon for the buyer to allow a seller to occupy a property for a period of time after the sale. Seller funds are withheld to pay the buyer rent and to insure the seller turns the property over to the buyer in satisfactory condition. On a short sale transaction though, the seller usually receives zero proceeds. So, there are no funds to hold back for rent and damages. What’s more, a seller may have little incentive to move out after the closing, requiring the buyer to take them to court to evict them. The seller may also remove items from the property in violation of the sale terms.
SOLUTION: The only real solution is to require the sellers to be out of the property before the closing of the transaction. The buyer should then do a final walk-thru of the property before the closing.
Short sales can be a way to get a great deal on a property if a buyer is careful and keeps the challenges in mind. It only takes one of the above challenges to turn a buyer’s dream into a nightmare, so hire professionals and proceed cautiously.
Readers, please comment on additional issues you know of that weren’t covered here that you may have personal experience with.
Please join my Fanpage @ www.facebook.com/TheLendingEdge for future real estate & mortgage articles.
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Expert, Michigan, Mortgage, Rochester, Royal Oak, Troy Posted in 1-TLE, First Time Buyer, Purchase, Short Sale | 1 Comment
May 31st, 2010

Should Borrowers care also?
A recent article I read online at a real estate blogging site called ActiveRain, brought out some interesting comments.
I was shocked after reading all the comments that most of the agents commenting seemed to endorse buyers shopping for a mortgage solely by price.
A couple of brave Loan Originators pointed out that LO’s could do the same thing to agents and recommend buyers & sellers shop solely for the agent willing to work for the lowest commission.
I don’t really see the tit-for-tat thing being constructive for either side.
Here’s the comment I posted:
I find it interesting that not one Realtor mentioned the experience and knowledge of a loan officer over price!
Hmmm, it seems the collective thoughts, of some of the best agents in the industry, are of the opinion that price is all that matters.
I can’t put into words how disappointed I am if this is truly the thought process of the brightest Realtor minds in this business.
The next time any of you want to complain about one of your deals not going smoothly or blowing up due to lender issues, just remember – the buyer shopped and got the best price, so everyone involved got what they deserved.
Not a very constructive comment either. I apologize as I was a bit steamed that the other half of our industry’s symbiotic relationship appears to think they could easily survive without experienced or knowledgeable LO’s.
That is the key to this debate. We’re all in this together. Each half needs the other to get paid.
I fully believe buyers should be shopping for the best deal. Rates & fees are only a small part of what makes up the best deal. The best rate & fees mean nothing if the deal doesn’t close due to incompetency.
So, do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
BTW – here’s a few of the responses by real estate agents to my post. Borrowers should note that they all endorse experience over lowest price:
|
Great post. There’s so much more than “the price.” Understandable that some of the comments were upsetting when you’re trying to do what’s best for the buyers. You are correct… we need each other!
|
|
|
|
|
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Expert, Michigan, Mortgage, Rochester, Royal Oak, Troy Posted in 1-TLE, Expert, First Time Buyer, Mortgage, Purchase, Rates, Refinance | No Comments
|