|
|
July 11th, 2010
On July 30, 2008 President Bush signed into law the Secure And Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (SAFE). The first time Loan Originators (LO) have been required to be licensed at the federal level.
The act is meant to enhance consumer protection and reduce mortgage fraud.
The act requires states to license Loan Originators by:
- Passing a written qualified test
- Complete pre-licensure educational courses
- Take annual continuing education courses
- Having LO’s allow their credit to be checked
- Submitting LO fingerprints to the NMLS for criminal background checks via the FBI
The licensing and registration started in 2009.
So how are loan officers doing with the required testing?
NMLS released the following statistics as of June 30, 2010:

What stands out is that 71% of LO’s so far pass the national component part of the test on their first try and 80% pass the state component. That’s a pretty good number.
On the other hand, only 44% of those that retake the test pass the national component. That’s horrible!
What’s this mean?
Well if you take into account that the test really doesn’t change that much on the subsequent retakes it could mean any of the following:
- those retaking the test do poorly with tests
- they’re not very good at studying
- they have no idea what they’re doing to begin with
It’s estimated that the NMLS requirements have led to over half the LO’s to leave the mortgage business in the past year.
Of course, the economy has played a large role in that also.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Expert, fraud, Michigan, Mortgage, nmls. test Posted in Certified, Expert, Fraud, Government, Licensing | No Comments »
March 23rd, 2010
In an attempt to protect homeowners from crooks, HUD recently announced PreventLoanScams.org.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
The number of companies offering Loan Modifications, with guarantees or success rate claims of 80% or more seems to be growing with the number of foreclosures.
Desperate homeowners are desperately believing that these companies will help them.
My advice is to run, don’t just walk, away from any individual or company that guarantees results for loan modifications and/or short sales.
I tell every and any client that retains me that I will strive to maximize their chances of success, but I can’t guarantee anything.
Here’s a copy of HUD’s press release below, you can read it at their website by clicking here:
HUD ADVANCES FIGHT AGAINST LOAN MODIFICATION SCAMS National Coalition Launches Online Scam Reporting Tool
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, in partnership with the Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network, today announced the launch of PreventLoanScams.org. “ Homeowners at risk of foreclosure can be easy prey for home loan modification scammers. Often, dishonest individuals lure vulnerable homeowners into foreclosure rescue scams by making false promises. Scammers frequently claim they can lower mortgage payments or stop the foreclosure process. ” “Troubled homeowners lose time and money when they are tricked by con artists who promise to help but never do,” said John Trasviña, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “This initiative combines the collective energies of public and private enterprises to strengthen the ability of law enforcement to prosecute scammers and protect homeowners.” The Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network, a national coalition of public and private enterprises, is led by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Homeownership Preservation Foundation, and NeighborWorks America assist the Lawyers’ Committee in leading the coalition’s fight against loan modification scams. The Network developed PreventLoanScams.org to provide homeowners with a single destination to report alleged scammers. Complaints filed online are added to a national complaint database and forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement agencies for review. The Network estimates that the website will assist approximately 50,000 homeowners affected by scams. Additionally, HUD has directed its local fair housing and housing counseling grantees to begin reporting alleged loan modification scams via the website. The creation of a national complaint database is a major step in the fight against loan modification scams. Prior to the launch of PreventLoanScams.org, federal, state, and local government agencies could not share complaint data with non-profit organizations. The new system allows for better analysis of trends across jurisdictional lines and will likely lead to an increase in private enforcement action filings.
Posted in 1-TLE, Fraud, Government, HUD, Loan Modifications | 3 Comments »
January 29th, 2010
Homeowners & Agents Beware – following this lender’s advice could be illegal and land you in jail.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
Below is a conversation recorded by a real estate agent with a supervisor in the loss mitigation department of an unidentified lender with a second lien on a short sale property.
To the best of our knowledge, this is totally illegal (but we’re not attorneys) and could lead to serious legal issues for any agent or homeowner that signed an affidavit on a short sale with such a side deal.
This is just another example of different rules for Wall Street and Main Street. Where are all the politicians on this? Oh – they’re probably spending the money the banks bribed (oops, I mean lobbied) them with.
NOTE: This is from a blogpost by Jeremy Brandt, which can be accessed at:
www.jeremybrandt.com/short-sale-fraud-recording/
The Short Sales and Bank Fraud story continues to gain traction. After CNBC aired the story we brought them, dozens of other media outlets, bloggers and authorities have contacted me to discuss this topic.
Here is the story of how this fraud initially came to our attention, along with the evidence to back it up.
Last year, I was contacted by an experienced real estate agent in our network who negotiates many short sales. She had recorded a conversation between her and a supervisor in the loss-mitigation department at a major national lender, who she felt was trying to get her to do something illegal.
Here is the audio of that recording, along with the transcript. The names have been removed at the request of the agent to prevent backlash from the bank.
AGENT: OK, so the only way to settle with *LENDER* then is to get money from somebody else and pay it prior to – that’s what *LENDER-EMPLOYEE* suggested – pay it prior to close of escrow, outside of…. <unintelligible> Pardon me?
LENDER: That is something you can do.
AGENT: Pay it outside of escrow, off the HUD, prior to close.
LENDER: Right, that’s something you could do.
AGENT: And is that something you guys do regularly or you see people doing?
LENDER: Yes, that happens – we have people that send us money outside if they need approval letters <unintelligible> from the first, and once we receive the additional funds, the approval letter can be sent for what the first actually offered – so it happens.
AGENT: OK and what about the fact that the first says that, no more than you know, a certain percent is to go to the second?
LENDER: OK, if the first… Here’s the thing, if you’re asking what this is about – the first is saying “well here’s what I’m going to allow” and the first is saying “this is what we’re willing to pay out.” If there’s a contribution, if you don’t want to be able to come up with the additional that we’re asking for – the first has already gave their approval on what they’re doing – what someone just comes up with has nothing to do with the first.
AGENT: Even if on this letter it says that “the second is not to receive any more than a certain amount”?
LENDER: The first can not dictate what we receive. The first is saying what they are only going to allow. That’s the amount that they’re allowing to us. If someone out there – the buyer – or a family member puts more money and says here’s what I want to give for you because here’s the additionally requested funds – that has nothing to do with the first. You’re not asking the first to come out of their pocket any extra than what they are willing to give. So that that’s not any information that might have to be required on the HUD. Hold on one second please. <long pause>
LENDER: So I need to have the information – you’ve had the opportunity to go over this with *LENDER-EMPLOYEE* – did he explain all this to you on how this takes place?
AGENT: Well he does but I’m having a tough time, ******, I’m licensed and everybody else…
LENDER: It’s not illegal; it’s not a hard thing, this thing that has happened. The information that you’ve actually received from us – we’re actually trying to help you get this deal closed. If you choose to go back and tell the first what’s going on – you’re going to kill the deal. So what actually happens prior to closing has nothing to do with the first. What happens at closing – that is information you can provide to them. If you are able to come up with additional funds not to get this deal closed prior to closing, then that’s fine – that’s irrelevant for the first. If you go ahead and you want to let the first know “well, here’s all the information that I have – here’s what’s going on” you will be the one to actually kill this deal. I’m trying to actually give you a way to go about getting this resolved. If you take our suggestion – you take the information that *LENDER-EMPLOYEE* has given you – you can have this done. If not, then you know, those guys are going to foreclose on it and it’s a done deal. But it’s not like we’re holding up this process.
AGENT: Well, what about the form that the buyer’s lender puts out that there are – that everybody has to sign that says there are no side deals? <long pause> I mean that… How do I get around that?
LENDER: What you need to take care of actually is not going to be a problem. What they submit to us – there is $****** they are giving us – the only thing you have to worry about – I mean it sounds like you’re scared that you’re going to be fined for something because you are doing something you are not supposed to. This is what we do all day.
AGENT: Well yes, I don’t want to lose my license, go to jail, I mean, I have to sign…
LENDER: You’re not going to lose your license – we have plenty of realtors who do this, who actually understand how this whole process goes – and they realize that OK, if I want to get this done, this will take place. Nobody’s losing their license and nobody’s going to jail, nobody’s receiving a fine… So and here’s the thing too, I’ll be really honest with you, if you are uncomfortable about working it, you can probably assign it over to someone else, where they would be able to do this – if it makes you feel that uncomfortable – you should probably just assign it over to someone else. Someone who’s actually been able you know – who’s done this before, who’s more familiar with it. Not to be disrespectful or rude to you or anything like that, but we deal with this every day all the time, this is not something out of the norm. But if you feel like you are doing something that’s against your morals, please assign it to someone else who’s been able to do deals like this so they can get it done, and you can have a happy buyer and a happy seller.
AGENT: Well, how do I get, I mean what’s the logic or if I could understand – when I’m signing a paper put out by FHA that says there are no side deals – this is a side deal.
LENDER: This is a contribution. <long pause> You guys are able to come up with money in order to get this deal closed.
AGENT: OK
LENDER: OK. So
the offer that we have it still stands – you can call *LENDER-EMPLOYEE* back and let him know if, what you’re going to do, and if you guys foreclose, we understand. If you’re not comfortable with this – go ahead and assign it over to someone else.
AGENT: <sigh> OK, well thank you for your time.
LENDER: No Problem
Posted in 1-TLE, Fraud, Short Sale | No Comments »
September 30th, 2009
I’ve never reposted someone else’s blog before, but this one was compelling enough. Martin Andelman is a bit “in your face” and a bit more than a little negative. However, he makes great points and calls it like it really is.
“Enjoy”, but fasten your seatbelt…
Loan Modifications: Obama’s Part of Problem, Not Solution
Posted: 29 Sep 2009 04:53 AM PDT
I didn’t want to ever have to write that headline. Like so many millions of Americans, I voted for Barack Obama and truth be told there was one big reason. No, not Sarah Palin. And not because he was the anti-Bush. I voted for Barack Obama for a reason that didn’t show up in the polls: the housing foreclosure crisis; he would do something to stop it.
I know now that I’m far from being alone in this. And I know why it didn’t show up in the polls, after all, during all that joy that was present during the month leading up to the Obama victory, and certainly immediately following it, who was going to talk to pollsters about something as depressing as being at risk of foreclosure? Even today, few people want to make public the fact that they may be losing their home, or even that they’ve already lost a home to foreclosure.
It’s in the press, no question about it, but more in a macro sense. It’s “out there,” as opposed to being “right here”. Even here in Southern California, one of the hardest his areas of the country in terms of people being at risk of foreclosure, I run my errands, go about my business, and don’t bump into it at all. In fact, as I wait for my car to come up in valet parking, all I see are BMWs, Mercedes, and Lexii… the foreclosure crisis seems very far away, even though I know, and certainly as well as anyone, that it’s not.
I know because of where my writing has taken me. I never intended to write over 150 articles and exposes about the foreclosure crisis. And I never thought I’d my writing would touch the lives of so many homeowners that they would call or write to me to tell me their stories and ask my advice. Why would they? I knew nothing about mortgages, and the only way I knew to avoid foreclosure was to pay my mortgage payment each month. Why would anyone call me? But they did and they have and they still do… every single day. And I have no idea how many at this point… hundreds certainly, maybe more. And I talk to them all, sometimes for hours at a time because I care a whole lot about what’s happened to them, and what’s happening throughout our country, and I don’t know if I can really matter, but I have to try.
I started writing about the meltdown in earnest about a year ago, although I did write a few articles beginning maybe a year before that. My first was about what was happening on Wall Street and why. I think the headline read: What’s Happening on Wall Street and Why… I’ve never been a very clever headline writer. I wrote it to help people understand what I knew was a very complex problem, but also one that everyone would soon need to understand.
Then, the government followed by the press started laying the blame for the crisis on “sub-prime borrowers,” and I felt compelled to get involved. It was never “the borrowers,” who were at fault for causing this crisis, let alone the sub-prime borrowers. People with relatively low credit scores and incomes who wanted houses did not destroy the U.S. and global financial markets, no matter what anyone might think. And it wasn’t stated income loans either.
Of course, I chose sarcasm to express my point. I made a tee shirt that said: “Sub-Prime Borrowers Unite. Be Nice to Me or I’ll Stop Making My Car Payments Too.” And I wrote an article to go along with that sarcastic sentiment: “Coming to Terms With the New Power Elite: Sub-Prime Borrowers.” The article was my attempt to point out the fallacies that had quickly become conventional wisdom… it was the sub-prime borrowers’ fault. It was nonsense then… and we now, of course, know… now that 54% of the foreclosures are prime loans, that it wasn’t the borrowers at all… it was and is the banks that have caused this pain.
‘Borrowers didn’t break the capital markets. Borrowers didn’t fraudulently package mortgage backed securities and stand by as they were improperly rated AAA. Borrowers didn’t slice those securities up in a million derivative ways, or leverage them to the hilt, before buying and selling them along with their worthless insurance policies known as credit default swaps. Nope, as all of things and more went on, there wasn’t a single borrower to be found anywhere.
Most annoyingly, it certainly wasn’t borrowers who, knowing that increasing future defaults were imminent, agreed to lower their bank’s reserves for future losses in order to pay themselves untold billions in bonuses. There’s another way of putting that… it wasn’t borrowers that robbed the banks, it was the bankers that robbed the banks. (Why they all still have jobs is beyond me. How big a bank do you have to rob in this country to go to jail anyway?)
Of what were the borrowers guilty? Every time I ask this question I get a fringe answer. You know, the story: A 19 year-old college student bought an $11 million home on the water in Newport Beach. Or how about: The family with income of only $3600 a month, but whose mortgage payment was $4800. It’s a lot like when people talk about welfare fraud, and they point to some woman with 19 children who hasn’t even looked for a job since 1983, conveniently ignoring the fact the more than 70% of welfare spending is spent on children.
At worst Borrowers were guilty of bad judgment. Of trusting bankers. Of wanting more in life than they had in the past. Mostly, however, borrowers, if they were guilty of anything at all, were guilty of not seeing The Great Depression, Part 2 coming around the corner, just like… of, say Henry Paulson, or Ben Bernanke. Bankers, on the other hand, many of them were guilty of criminal fraud. Of manipulating securities. Of trading on inside knowledge. Of lying left and right to everyone, if that’s still a crime in this country.
So, I wrote in order to help people who were suffering understand that what was happening in this country, as our economy slid further into the abyss, was not their fault. It was a controversial viewpoint in the beginning, and I’m thankful it is much less so today. One day, and not so far from now, it won’t be controversial in the least. As of September 26, 2009, the Justice Department is working on 570 cases related to the demise of Wall Street’s banks, so it won’t be long before we all see the arrests and criminal charges levied against the mortgage bank robbers who used to think, a’la Enron, that they were the smartest guys in the room. As far as I’m concerned… that day cannot come soon enough. Maybe then we can start the healing process, and maybe we’ll be better for it.
Regardless all of that, here we are in the fall of 2009, and the crisis has only deepened, and deepened significantly. And not only is that the case, but in addition, both our state and federal governments, by virtue of their incredible l
ack of understanding as to what’s really going on, have only made things worse… and significantly worse. What up with these guys? Do they just feel compelled to turn checkers into chess, or are they actually that out of touch that they can’t even see how incredibly stupid they so often appear?
I’m really not sure anymore, but if anyone in government is reading this, and I know that you are, then you might as well hear it from me… you’re embarrassing yourselves… terribly, and although it may not be showing up in today’s poles, it’s there… just under the surface, waiting for the curtain to close in the next election’s voting booth.
Brass Tacks…
Okay, so let’s dispense with the pleasantries and call it like it is. According to our government, here’s all there is to know about getting a loan modification:
1. Call your bank directly. You don’t need anyone to help you with a loan modification. It’s easy, thanks to the President’s Making Home Affordable program.
2. If you feel you need assistance, call a HUD counselor, or other nonprofit. That’s it, and that’s all.
3. Whatever you do, don’t pay anyone in advance, no matter what, because paying in advance always makes someone a scammer.
4. There are zillions of scammers out there ripping off what must be hundreds of thousands of homeowners each day. I’m surprised every time I leave my house these days and return home without getting scammed. Just lucky, I suppose. Oh and by the way, so far the FTC and the Attorney General have shut down… 22 companies. I feel a lot safer.
5. If a private sector company wants to help homeowners, it should be willing to work for months on end with a lender or servicer and then send their bill at the end. What a plan… become an unsecured creditor of someone who is having trouble paying their bills and already has bad credit.
And that’s not even the worst of it…
The irrational thinking has led to some of the most contradictory statements that I’ve ever heard come out of a legitimate government. Try these…
? These people paid this company $3,000 and they didn’t even get a loan modification.
? No company can guarantee you that your loan will be modified.
? If they fail to get your loan modified, they have to refund your money.
? You don’t need help getting a loan modification; it’s easy to do it by yourself.
? For help with a loan modification contact a HUD certified counselor.
? The law firm took the clients money and failed to deliver anything of value.
? According to the Obama administration, servicers aren’t doing what they agreed to do.
? Bank of America only modified 4% of the eligible loans.
? Lawyers are using their law licenses to con desperate homeowners out of $3,000.
? August foreclosures came in at 356,000, the sixth straight month over 300,000.
? Another wave of foreclosures expected.
? The recession is over, probably.
Look… I’m not playing around here. Stop treating the country like we can’t put two and two together.
The evidence of servicer nonperformance is now abundant, and coming directly from the U.S. Treasury, but nothing the government says has changed one iota. Hasn’t anyone linked the two things together… the servicers refusals to do modifications, with the firms failing to obtain loan modifications? Really? Someone do something about this… this one is too stupid for me to mention ever again.
They attack private sector companies that charge a fee for trying to help someone accomplish something that the government can’t get done either, even after giving away a few hundred million. WTF.
I read stuff like this every day. Just a few weeks ago, a friend who knows how much this stuff annoys me, sent me an article that had appeared in a mid-western newspaper. It was a front-page type of article, huge though, and it showed a nice young couple standing with a baby in their arms, in front of a foreclosed home, sign and all. To sum it all up in a phrase… the story said that the couple had written a supposed law firm a check for $1,000 last March, the company was the now infamous FedMod… and that’s why they lost their home.
Holy macaroni! I had no idea that could even happen to someone as a result of writing a check to a law firm, regardless of whether the law firm was legit or not. I wrote a check to a contractor once for $2500 and got ripped off, but I didn’t lose my home or my car or anything as a result. What the heck happened here?
I wonder what the government brain in trust thinks when they see people continuing to write checks to companies up front, even though everyone in America has been told by the President and everyone else on down, not to do that. Why do you suppose they keep doing it, are they stupid? Don’t people watch television?
No, they heard you. They’re doing it because they’ve tried what you suggested and it didn’t work worth a damn. Are you listening, by the way?
There’s another possibility, of course. They could all be in the pocket of the banks, but that’s hard to believe. I’m not talking about Obama, Geithner, and the gang at the Harvard Goldman Club… they are unquestionably in the banker’s pockets. I’m talking about everyone else in state and local government… the bankers can’t have bought them all over to their point of view, can they? All of them?
I can’t be the only one that sees what the banks are doing here, right? I know at least 100 attorneys that know what they’re doing because they’ve seen it first hand on hundreds of occasions.
Banks are telling homeowners that they don’t need a lawyer. Isn’t that giving legal advice? Isn’t that the unauthorized practice of law? Why, yes… I believe it is. But who in the country has the balls to sue or bring charges against a bank? Likely, no one. And besides… why all of a sudden does everyone care so much whether I hire a lawyer? I’ve run my own firm for twenty years… and no one ever cared if I hired a lawyer before. Now it’s seems that even the American Bar Association doesn’t think lawyers should be representing homeowners trying to obtain loan modifications. Why do you supposed that would be.
The Bottom-Line…
President Obama… we haven’t heard from you on the housing and foreclosure since last spring when you gave a speech to adoring and cheering crowds. You set their expectations way above what your program delivers, your administration has spent more time grandstanding over the 22 firms you’ve shut down… you’ve made a mess.
One homeowner who watched your speech in late February recently told NPR that when heard you describe the program he felt as if you were speaking directly to him. And then he went through hell trying to get one. It wasn’t his fault, Mr. President… it’s yours.
This whole thing… the foreclosure crisis is going to be laid at your feet in 2010. Either you owe quite a few people an apology, or you better get on the stick and fix it… fast.
We didn’t vote for you in order to hear excuses about servicers being overwhelmed. And we certainly didn’t vote for you in order not to hear from you… to have Treasury and the Fed stonewalling Freedom of Information requests. We voted for you because it meant change. And so far, when it comes to the foreclosure crisis, what you consider change is not the kind many people are believing in these days
http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/
Posted in 1-TLE, Distressed Property, Foreclosure, Fraud, Government, Housing Values | 3 Comments »
July 19th, 2009
Loan Modification companies seem to be the latest mortgage industry group in the crosshairs of government officials.
MORTGAGE EXPERT, DETROIT, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY, MICHIGAN – DETROIT, MI – Over the last several weeks I’ve noticed a substantial increase in the number of loan modification companies being investigated by various government agencies.
All I can say is that it’s about time.
Now don’t misinterpret that statement – I believe that loan modifications may be part of a viable solution in getting our country out of the current housing crisis, although it’s too soon to determine their actual long-term effectiveness.
I also have nothing against loan modification companies in general nor the people that work at them. I’ve met or connected with many individuals that are intent on really helping people and do their best to do so.
Lastly, many homeowners do need some type of assistance as lenders don’t have their best interests in mind when they do loan modifications and many lenders draw the process out seemingly forever.
On the other hand, I’ve personally heard many stories from homeowners victimized by loan modification companies, have heard the same stories from mortgage associates and have read many more on the internet.
From Subprime to Loan Mods I predicted over a year ago that loan modification companies would become the new subprime “churn & burn” debacle. This was triggered by my observations that many local subprime loan originators were flocking to do loan modifications. I even heard several stories of these originators approaching the same clients they’d put in subprime loans, with offers to now do loan modifications for them.
There really is no barrier of entry to do loan modifications. All you need is a phone and the ability to find clients. Finding clients is easy with so many homeowners struggling with their mortgage payment.
This should all sound familiar as much of it applied to the mortgage industry in general until recently, when state governments started requiring individual licensing of loan originators and the federal government created a national registration system.
When Michigan enacted its Loan Officer Registration Act, April 1, 2009, the state expected 10,000 to register based on past data. To date only 3141 have met the requirements of 24 hours of class time, passed a multiple choice test and background screening. How many of the unregistered do you think are now using their limited mortgage knowledge to do loan modifications?
Desperate People do Desperate Things One would think that a homeowner, burned by a bad mortgage, would be a bit more cautious when considering a loan modification.
The number of loan mod companies popping up however, prove otherwise. It’s basic supply and demand – the numbers of these companies wouldn’t be expanding if there weren’t desperate homeowners to support them.
So, how do homeowners get burned by these companies? In no particular order:
- Paying upfront fees for a modification never completed.
- Being told they’ll get a principal balance reduction, when in reality it rarely happens.
- Getting approved for a modification that raises their payment or insignificantly lowers it.
- Following advice to not contact their lenders during the loan mod process, only to get foreclosed on.
- Not being made fully aware of the possible credit damage, legal issues and tax consequences.
It’s all boils down to these companies over-promising and under-delivering.
What Took the Government So Long to Act? If I saw this problem coming over a year ago, you’d think the smart people in our government would’ve saw it coming also.
In a recent informal poll of mortgage originators by “Think Big Work Small”, 81% responded that over 50% of those doing loan modifications are “rats”.
Unfortunately, just like with the mortgage meltdown and the banking crisis, the government only seems to act after the damage has already been done. Here’s a list of the agencies currently chasing loan mod companies:
- Federal Trade Commission
- United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California
- Arizona Attorney General’s Office
- California Department of Justice
- California Department of Real Estate
- State Bar of California
- Colorado Attorney General’s Office
- Idaho Attorney General’s Office
- Illinois Attorney General’s Office
- Iowa Department of Justice
- Kansas Attorney General’s Office
- Maine Attorney General’s Office
- Maine Department of Professional and Financial Regulation, Bureau of Consumer Protection
- Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation, Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation
- Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office
- Michigan Attorney General’s Office
- Missouri Attorney General’s Office
- New Jersey Attorney General’s Office
- New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance
- New Mexico Attorney General’s Office, Consumer Protection Division
- North Carolina Department of Justice
- Ohio Attorney General’s Office
- Oregon Department of Justice
- Texas Attorney General’s Office
- Washington Attorney General’s Office
Charges are being filed because of deceptive and/or false advertising (Section 5 of the FTC Act), charging upfront for services before rendered, unlicensed activities, mail fraud, attorney misconduct and several others.
Solutions The Obama administration really needs to step up and address this issue quickly. The crooks and sharks need to be forced out of the industry to protect homeowners. Honest professionals also need protection – from overzealous government agencies. It’d be a real shame if those that were actually doing good things for homeowners were put out of business, fined or jailed.
An easy to implement option would be to allow loan modifications to only be done by licensed mortgage companies and attorneys. The mechanisms are already in place across the country to control this.
A better solution would be for the administration to create a national solution instead of letting all 50 states come up with their individual plans. For a list of the loan modification companies currently be investigated, click here and then click on “preview”.
Posted in 1-TLE, Fraud, Government, Legal, Loan Modifications, Recovery | 3 Comments »
March 31st, 2009
Today was the deadline in Michigan for Mortgage Originators to register or be illegal!
On April 1, 2008, the state of Michigan passed a law called the, “Loan Officer Registration Act” (LORA) that required all mortgage originators to register with the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation (OFIR).
The law was passed to root out the “bad apples” in the mortgage business that helped contribute to the housing crisis by putting people into loans they couldn’t afford. Loan originators working for federally chartered institutions are exempt from the state law, but all brokers must comply.
The state had to extend the original January 1st, 2009 deadline to April 1, 2009, due to some issues with fingerprinting.
What’s interesting is that even with the extension, the number of complying originators was very small. OFIR sent out a memo to all mortgage brokers on February 24th, 2009 titled, “Alarmingly Low Number or Mortgage Loan Officer Registration Applications Received by OFIR”. OFIR noted that they expected 10,000 applications, but as of that date had received less than 1,000 applications with only 55 being approved.
On March 27th, 2009, OFIR sent out a warning letter titled, “Loan Officer Registration, Loan Officer Notification, and Loan Officer Enforcement”, warning of coming investigations and penalties for noncompliance.
So, where are we at the deadline?
Well, as of the close of business March 31st, 2009 OFIR’s website showed only 1,490 mortgage originators are registered to legally originate mortgages in the state of Michigan.
Several consumers recently found out the mortgage broker they were dealing with, Capita Management Group in Southfield, was operating without a license. OFIR issued them an “Order to Cease and Desist” on March 19th, 2009.
So, if you’re looking to buy a home or refinance your existing mortgage, you might want to make sure that the loan originator you’re working with is operating legally.
By the way, feel free to look me up on OFIR’s list of REGISTERED mortgage originators.
Posted in 1-TLE, Certified, Expert, Fraud, Government, Legal, Licensing, Michigan, Mortgage, Mortgage Broker | 3 Comments »
March 2nd, 2009
The State of Michigan is worried as few loan officers are complying with Michigan’s new registration law.
Michigan – Back in April of 2008, the Michigan legislature passed a law called the Michigan Loan Officer Registration Act (LORA).
The law was basically passed to get as many of the bad players out of the mortgage industry as possible. Loan officers now have to do the following to work in the industry:
- Take a 24 hour class if they have less than 4.5 years experience in originating loans.
- Pass a test focused on national & state mortgage regulations.
- Get fingerprinted.
- Pass a background check with no felonies in the last 10 years.
The government set up the registration process late and ended up pushing the original cutoff date back from January 1, 2009 to April 1, 2009. Despite all the talk in industry circles about this registration law since it passed, some are still clueless about it! I spoke with one of my competitors in early February and they claimed to have never heard about the law. What’s scary is that they’ll probably be writing loans illegally after April 1st.
Early numbers on the testing showed over 40% of loan originators failing, probably because they thought the test would just be on products and qualifying borrowers for loans. The test is actually focused on knowing the laws regarding loan origination.
It’s interesting to note that loan originators working for federally charted banks are exempt from the state law and don’t have to register with the state.
I just wish the local papers would do a better job of covering this, so the public would understand what’s going on and ask loan originators to validate they are in compliance.
So few originators are actually registering that the state is worried enough to have sent out the following letter to all mortgage brokers in the state:
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM
governor
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE REGULATION
Department of Energy, Labor & Economic Growth
Stanley “Skip” Pruss, Director
KEN ROSS
commissioner
February 24, 2009
TO: All Mortgage Broker, Lender, and Servicer Licensees and Registrants
RE: ALARMINGLY LOW NUMBER OF MORTGAGE LOAN OFFICER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS RECEIVED BY OFIR
The Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, and Servicers Licensing Act, 1987 PA 173, as amended, MCL 445.1651 et seq. (MBLSLA) and the Secondary Mortgage Loan Act, 1981 PA 125, as amended, MCL 493.51 et seq. (SMLA) require each mortgage broker, lender, and servicer licensee/registrant to register its individual loan officers with the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation (OFIR) by April 1, 2009. To “register” as a loan officer means receiving formal notification from OFIR stating that the individual is approved as a loan officer registrant.
I am very concerned with the low number of mortgage loan officer registration applications that have been submitted by mortgage broker, lender, and servicer licensees/registrants pursuant to the MBLSLA and SMLA. To date, less than 1,000 loan officer registrant applications have been submitted in the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System (NMLS), with only 55 of these applications being complete and receiving formal OFIR approval. Based on past mortgage broker, lender, and servicer annual reports, we estimate that approximately 10,000 loan officers should be applying for loan officer registration.
Each mortgage broker, lender, and servicer licensee and registrant is responsible and is accountable for getting its loan officer registered with OFIR. An individual that is not a registered loan officer is not authorized to be compensated for a mortgage loan transaction originated beginning April 1, 2009.
Violation of the MBLSLA or SMLA by an unregistered loan officer is a misdemeanor, subject to[pb1] fines/penalties and up to 1 year imprisonment[1]. Violations of the MBLSLA or SMLA intended to circumvent the loan officer registration requirements, including utilization/compensation of an unregistered loan officer, can lead to civil fines and possible revocation of a mortgage company license/registration[2].
Links to the loan officer amendments to the MBLSLA and SMLA have been sent to every mortgage broker, lender, and servicer licensee and registrant. Also, OFIR sent each licensee/registrant multiple e-mail and postal mail notifications that provide updated information and instructions regarding the loan officer registration requirements and timeframes.
Loan Officer Registration Deadline
February 24, 2009
So only 55 out of 1,000 applicants have completed the registration, from an expected pool of 10,000! I’m sure the state is also missing the revenue from all this also.
It’ll be very interesting to see how many loan officers get arrested for operating illegally after April 1st.
Will your loan officer be one of them?
Posted in 1-TLE, Certified, Expert, Fraud, Government, Legal, Licensing, Michigan, Mortgage, Mortgage Broker | No Comments »
November 23rd, 2008

Like a Mayfly (or fishfly), loan modifications won’t be around long,
but they may leave a nasty “smell” just like the refinance boom has.
November 23, 2008 — BLOOMFIELD, MI – If you live near a freshwater lake or river, chances are you’re familiar with mayflies. These small flying insects hatch by the millions in late spring or early summer, swarming over everything, especially light sources. Having no mouth or digestive system, they frantically mate to reproduce before dying, smelling all the while like dead fish. The only good thing about them is their short lifespan – some species live for an hour, most not more than a day.
Loan modifications have a lot in common with these creatures.
This past spring and early summer news coverage of loan modifications swarmed in frequency and the public became very aware of the term and concept. Recently, the activity of loan modifications has also swarmed as lenders have fallen over themselves announcing how many hundreds of thousands of loan modifications they’re targeting to do.
Swarms of bankers, mortgage originators, attorneys and others have been drawn to loan modifications like a mayfly to a streetlight. The opportunity to make a quick buck with loan modifications is eerily similar to the fast money that attracted many to the mortgage refinance boom, just a few years ago.
A lack of regulation and almost nonexistent entry requirements allowed many incompetents and crooks into the mortgage industry. They greedily refinanced homeowners into bad situations, took their money and quickly disappeared – leaving behind the rotten stench of the current foreclosure mess.
The bad news is the growing industry of loan modifications has little, if any, regulation. Many desperate homeowners will be duped out of money they can’t afford to lose by greedy opportunists, way over-promising and delivering nothing.
The good news is that just like a swarm of mayflies, the industry’s days are already numbered. FNMA hastened the end with their announcement to standardize loan mods and offering lenders an $800 incentive to do them. Once the list of qualifying homeowners is worked through and real estate values stabilize, loan mods will be a thing of the past.
Posted in 1-TLE, Expert, Fraud, Loan Modifications, Recovery | No Comments »
|