With the world’s largest bond fund PIMCO stating there’s a 25% chance of deflation, the Federal Reserve announces new measures to spur the U.S. economy.
The Federal Reserve met yesterday and the markets held their collective breath to see what actions the Fed would take.
Citing continued concerns about the economy, the Fed left rates where they were as expected.
All the signs and statements point to the Fed being more & more concerned about deflation and the resulting contraction of the economy. The Federal Reserve Press Release published after the meeting pointed out:
Bank lending has continued to contract.
and:
To help support the economic recovery in a context of price stability, the Committee will keep constant the Federal Reserve’s holdings of securities at their current level by reinvesting principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities.1The Committee will continue to roll over the Federal Reserve’s holdings of Treasury securities as they mature.
That last part is very good news for the housing industry.
The Fed reinvesting into more bonds means they’ll still be effectively subsidizing interest rates.
Don’t celebrate too soon though. The Fed also remarked:
Household spending is increasing gradually, but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit.
These factors are all working against many potential buyers taking the plunge into home ownership along with the contracted lending policies of the banking system.
Deflation will also work against the housing market. You’ve probably already witnessed a deflationary mindset and didn’t recognize it. Many potential home buyers have waited to buy a home believing that prices will continue to fall. Think about a significant portion of consumers taking that attitude with cars, electronics, etc. The whole economy goes into a tailspin that’s not easy to get out of.
When can we expect to see a sustained recovery in the housing market?
Look to the employment numbers.
I don’t mean the unemployment numbers! Those are now skewed by the numbers of people that have given up on looking for a job.
When people start going back to work and getting raises, they’ll start buying houses.
In the mean time, those that can afford to buy will realize the best deals.
Michigan, Mortgage, Expert, Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Rochester, Royal Oak, Troy
Due to continued losses from FHA foreclosures, HUD is increasing borrower fees to generate more revenue and avoid having to ask Congress for a bailout.
September 7th, 2010 HUD is changing the MIP fees it charges borrowers for FHA mortgages.
The changes are expected o generate an additional $300 million per MONTH for HUD’s FHA insurance program.
That’s an extra $3.6 billion per year.
Here are the changes:
First, HUD is lowering the upfront MIP from its current 2.25% to 1.0%. This is the amount that can be financed on top of the loan amount.
Simultaneously, HUD is raising the monthly MIP amount:
For loans with less than 5% down – from 0.55% to 0.85%.
For loans with more than 5% down – from 0.50% to 0.90%
Now technically these changes only affect loans of more than 15 years, but in reality most FHA mortgages are 30 year loans.
How Do These Changes Affect Borrowers?
Let’s compare some different purchase price amounts to see what HUD done to homebuyers:
Note: all the examples below assume a 4.5% mortgage rate on a 30 fixed loan with the minimum 3.5% down.
Notice that at every purchase price amount the monthly cost has gone up!
This means that for any given monthly payment a buyer will now qualify for less of a purchase price due to the higher corresponding payment.
Just be glad HUD didn’t implement a FICO credit score pricing matrix as they have discussed numerous times. Just be forewarned – if FHA foreclosures don’t improve soon, that may still be implemented.
Are there any borrower benefits at all in this change?
There is if you can pay off your FHA loan quicker. Notice in the above chart that the actual financed amount & payment are lower under the new program. This is because of the lower upfront MIP amount.
For example, for a $75,000 purchase price the old plan had a principal & interest payment of $374.97 versus $370.38 under the new plan. That’s a savings of $4.59/month.
The easiest way to pay off an FHA mortgage would be to refinance to a FNMA or FHLMC conforming mortgage. But you’d need at least 10% equity to do so and FNMA/FHLMC have price adjustments for FICO credit scores, so you’d have to be careful and consult with a true expert mortgage professional about this.
More Information
If you’d like more information on this change you can click on the links below:
On July 30, 2008 President Bush signed into law the Secure And Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (SAFE). The first time Loan Originators (LO) have been required to be licensed at the federal level.
The act is meant to enhance consumer protection and reduce mortgage fraud.
The act requires states to license Loan Originators by:
Passing a written qualified test
Complete pre-licensure educational courses
Take annual continuing education courses
Having LO’s allow their credit to be checked
Submitting LO fingerprints to the NMLS for criminal background checks via the FBI
The licensing and registration started in 2009.
So how are loan officers doing with the required testing?
NMLS released the following statistics as of June 30,2010:
What stands out is that 71% of LO’s so far pass the national component part of the test on their first try and 80% pass the state component. That’s a pretty good number.
On the other hand, only 44% of those that retake the test pass the national component. That’s horrible!
What’s this mean?
Well if you take into account that the test really doesn’t change that much on the subsequent retakes it could mean any of the following:
those retaking the test do poorly with tests
they’re not very good at studying
they have no idea what they’re doing to begin with
It’s estimated that the NMLS requirements have led to over half the LO’s to leave the mortgage business in the past year.
Of course, the economy has played a large role in that also.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
The FDIC closed the first bank in Michigan this year, bringing the national year-to-date total to 50.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
This year is expected to be pretty tough on small community banks. Many will fail due to their aggressive lending to real estate developers and builders during the boom years.
The Housing Crisis put many of those developers and builders out of business and left the banks to foreclose on half finished real estate projects and vacant land worth a fraction of what was lent on it. If you think foreclosed houses have seen record price drops, imagine how bad the market’s beating up half finished houses and vacant land.
Visit the FDIC Failed Bank List for a complete and up to date list of bank failures going back to October 1, 2000.
Below is a copy of an FDIC email announcing the failure of a small Michigan community bank in Macomb County.
BTW: I found it comical that the FDIC has a spelling error in their email – can you find it?
From:FDIC Subscriptions [mailto:subscriptions@fdic.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 5:09 PM
Subject: Bank Closing – Lakeside Community Bank, Sterling Heights, MI
Importance:High
Bank Closing – Lakeside Community Bank, Sterling Heights, MI
On April 16, 2010, the FDIC was named as Receiver for Lakeside Community Bank, (CERT # 34878), Sterling Heights, MI by the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation. An assuming bank could not be located. Therefore, the FDIC will fulfill its obligation to Lakeside Community Bank depositors by mailing checks for their insured amount(s). For further information, please visit the FDIC web site: Lakesdie Community Bank (www.fdic.gov).
The FDIC does not send unsolicited e-mail. If this publication has reached you in error, or if you no longer wish to receive this service, please unsubscribe.
The Obama administration is looking for public input on addressing the home financing system in this country. Is this for real or are they just trying to pacify homeowners?
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
Below is a copy of the announcement that went out today.
This after several hearings in Congress about the causes of the failures of FNMA & FHLMC and yesterday’s testimony about what happened with Washington Mutual Bank, the largest bank failure in this country.
It’s interesting to note that Congress was warned by several experts that these institutions would fail, but members of Congress were more interested in perpetuating the false pretense of high homeownership and getting re-elected, as opposed to steering our country around the iceberg of the Housing Crisis.
Ever see the commercial where chimpanzees are partying in a conference room, celebrating the news on a chart showing their company is doing well? A guy comes in and rotates the chart telling them that they’ve more or less got it upside down and the company is drowning in red ink. One of the chimps rotates the chart back and then the head chimp makes the guy dance and all the chimps start partying again. That was Congress and Wall Street partying away at the taxpayer’s expense.
So, read below, but don’t be overly optimistic your voice will be heard anywhere but at the voting booth.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 14, 2010
Contacts:
Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960
HUD Public Affairs, (202) 708-0980
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SEEKS PUBLIC INPUT ON
REFORM OF THE HOUSING FINANCE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON – The Obama Administration today released questions for public comment on the future of the housing finance system, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the overall role of the federal government in housing policy. The questions have been designed to generate input from a wide variety of constituents, including market participants, industry groups, academic experts, and consumer and community organizations. The questions will also be published in a Federal Register notice requesting public comments, and information on the process for submitting comments will be included in that notice.
“A well-functioning housing finance system is critical to the long term stability of the housing market,” said Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. “Hearing from a wide variety of perspectives as we embark on this process is an important part of establishing a more stable and sound housing finance system for the American people.”
“This open process will help shape the future of our housing finance system,” said U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Shaun Donovan “The Obama administration is committed to engaging the public as we consider proposals for reforming the housing finance system in the context of our broader housing policy goals, and the best steps to get from where we are today to a stronger housing finance system.”
The Obama Administration will seek input in two ways. First, the public will have the opportunity to submit written responses to the questions published in the Federal Register online at www.regulations.gov. Second, the Administration intends to hold a series of public forums across the country on housing finance reform. Together these opportunities for input will give the public the chance to deepen the federal government’s understanding of the issues and to shape the policy response going forward.
This effort is both in keeping with this Administration’s commitment to openness and transparency and the President’s Open Government Initiative. This initiative represents a major change in the way federal agencies interact with the public by making agency operations and data more transparent and creating new ways for citizens to have an active voice in their government.
Questions for Public Solicitation of Input:
How should federal housing finance objectives be prioritized in the context of the broader objectives of housing policy?
Commentary could address: policy for sustainable homeownership; rental policy; balancing rental and ownership; how to account for regional differences; and affordability goals.
What role should the federal government play in supporting a stable, well-functioning housing finance system and what risks, if any, should the federal government bear in meeting its housing finance objectives?
Commentary could address: level of government involvement and type of support provided; role of government agencies; role of private vs. public capital; role of any explicit government guarantees; role of direct subsidies and other fiscal support and mechanisms to convey such support; monitoring and management of risks including how to balance the retention and distribution of risk; incentives to encourage appropriate alignment of risk bearing in the private sector; mechanisms for dealing with episodes of market stress; and how to promote market discipline.
Should the government approach differ across different segments of the market, and if so, how?
Commentary could address: differentiation of approach based on mortgage size or other characteristics; rationale for integration or separation of functions related to the single-family and multi-family market; whether there should be an emphasis on supporting the production of subsidized multifamily housing; differentiation in mechanism to convey subsidies, if any.
How should the current organization of the housing finance system be improved?
Commentary could address: what aspects should be preserved, changed, eliminated or added; regulatory considerations; optimal general organizational design and market structure; capital market functions; sources of funding; mortgage origination, distribution and servicing; the role of the existing government-sponsored enterprises; and the challenges of transitioning from the current system to a desired future system.
How should the housing finance system support sound market practices?
Commentary could address underwriting standards; how best to balance risk and access; and extent to which housing finance systems that reference certain standards and mortgage products contribute to this objective.
What is the best way for the housing finance system to help ensure consumers are protected from unfair, abusive or deceptive practices?
Commentary could address: level of consumer protections and limitation; supervising agencies; specific restrictions; and role of consumer education
7. Do housing finance systems in other countries offer insights that can help inform US reform choices?
If you’re an upside down Michigan homeowner that’s current on your non-FHA mortgage and you owe more than 115% of your home’s current value, FHA may have a deal for you!
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
The government is getting more serious about bailing out the housingindustry with HUD’s latest announcement about the new FHA program.
It’s potentially good news for upside down Michigan homeowners, as to make a loan eligible for the program, the lender must write down the principal balance AND make sure the payment isn’t more than 31% of income.
The program is voluntary for lenders, but if the government can get enough lenders to actually participate this could finally be the program that stabilizes the housing market.
Here are some highlights of the program:
Voluntary option for lenders and borrowers with mortgages NOT currently insured by FHA.
Encourages lenders and borrowers to work together, when appropriate, to restructure debts.
Loans must have a minimum writedown of 10% and all mortgages on a property total to less than 115% of the property’s current value.
Eligible upside down Michigan homeowners are refinanced into new FHA-insured loans on standard FHA refinance terms for documentation, income ratios and complete underwriting.
Terms of FHA refinancing:
New FHA loan must be equal to no more than 97.75% of the current value of the property.
Combined mortgage debt must be written down to a maximum of 115% of the current value of the home.
Standard mortgage insurance premium structure will apply.
Mandatory principal writedown as part of refinance.
Minimum writedown by lender of at least 10% of the unpaid balance of the original loan.
Reduced monthly mortgage payments to facilitate sustainable homeownership:
Rate on refinanced loan will be set at prevailing FHA interest rate.
Total monthly mortgage payment, including second mortgage, will not be greater than approximately 31% of gross monthly income.
Total debt service including all forms of household debt will not be greater than approximately 50% of gross monthly income, except for some borrowers with especially strong credit histories.
Existing lenders can retain their second mortgages on the property, but only up to a combined 115% of the current value of the home.
If there is an existing mortgage that is not extinguished, lenders must agree to re-subordinate and extinguish any amount over 115% of the current value of the home.
Homeowner Eligibility
Homeowners must be current on their mortgage payments.
Homeowner must occupy the home as their primary residence and fully document their income.
Homeowners must qualify under standard FHA borrower guidelines.
Homeowners must have a FICO credit score of at least 500.
Existing lenders’ choice to consent for an FHA refinancing of this type is voluntary given the principal writedown requirement. Thus, not all homeowners who meet above criteria will receive an FHA refinanced loan.
As with any loan forgiveness, the short refinancing will be reflected on borrowers’ credit score.
HUD plans to use up to $14 billion in TARP funding to support the FHA refinance options. The funds will be used to payoff second liens, provide incentives to servicers and provide coverage for some share of potential losses resulting from the newly refinanced loans.
Here’s an example provided by HUD:
Example of a Typical FHA Refinance
In 2006: Family A took out a 30-year fixed mortgage with a balance of $250,000 and an interest rate of 9.0%. Their monthly payment was about $2,000 per month.
Today: Home prices have dropped and Family A’s home is worth $180,000.
With a FHA Refinance: Family A’s loan balance will be reduced to $207,000 and their monthly payment will fall to about $1300 per month. This will reduce their principal balance by about $33,000 and reduce their monthly payments by about $700 per month, saving the family nearly $42,000 over the next 5 years.
When will this all be available to upside down Michigan homeowners? HUD says,
“FHA will move to implement this as quickly as possible and expect that lenders can begin making decisions by the fall. Specific guidelines will be posted in a FHA Mortgagee Letter in the near future.”
You can read HUD’s press release about the program here, be sure to click on the links at the bottom for even more info.
Friday, March 26, 2010 marks a new level of federal commitment to bail out the U.S. housing market. Just don’t ask who’s going to pay for it.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
Last year, on March 4, President Obama announced his Making Home Affordable initiative. A big part of this plan was the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), designed to lower homeowner payments as an inducement to stay and pay, as opposed to walking away from their upside down homes. It was announced that 3-4 million homeowners would be helped with this plan.
When it was announced, most academic and financial experts commented that it wouldn’t work. They went on to say only lowering principal balances would really keep people in their homes. Upside down homeowners would figure out in time that even lower payments was still throwing good money after bad.
Much to President Obama’s chagrin, the experts have been proven right and his announcement Friday concedes this. Less than 170,000 homeowners have been granted permanent modifications under HAMP.
The announced “Enhancements” to HAMP address this shortcoming of the plan.
The actual announcement with a detailed commentary is below, but a few very serious questions:
How’s this plan going to be paid for?
Who’s going to police the banks that deliberately drag their collective feet because they don’t want to do loan modifications?
Where are the penalties for these banks and their executives?
Bear with me on one more observation & comment: this country was founded on the principal of freedom. For that reason, our constitution clearly separates church & state – which was a major issue when it was written.
Now we’re way past due for a separation of bank & state. Too many of our politicians are in bed with Wall Street and the banks. They eagerly line up for bribes contributions from the banking lobby, which gives them the money to campaign and get re-elected. What’s more, many of those Obama has appointed or surrounded himself with are from the wrong side of Wall Street.
Remember this when you next vote – career politicians are more interested in keeping their jobs than they are in doing what’s right. Against term limits? You must have your head in the sand AND blinders on not to see what’s happening to our country.
Today the Administration announced enhancements to the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to provide additional resources for struggling homeowners. These changes will provide temporary mortgage assistance to some unemployed homeowners, encourage servicers to write-down mortgage debt as part of a HAMP modification, allow more borrowers to qualify for modification through HAMP, and help borrowers move to more affordable housing when modification is not possible. The changes will be implemented in the coming months. (What they mean is they don’t know when they can coerce the banks into actually following the new plan as they’ve had “so much success” with getting them to follow last year’s plan.)
Unemployed borrowers meeting eligibility criteria will have an opportunity to have their mortgage payments temporarily reduced to an affordable level for a minimum of 3 months, and up to six months for some borrowers, while they look for a new job. If homeowners don’t find a job before the temporary assistance period is over or if they find a job with a
reduced income, they will be evaluated for a permanent HAMP modification or may be eligible for HAMP’s alternatives to foreclosure program. (Have they read their own unemployment/underemployment numbers? Millions unemployed, but only 170,00 permanent modifications in the last 12 months. This is just delaying the inevitable for many. Read below, the alternatives are deed-in-lieu & foreclosure – homeowners still lose.)
To expand the use of principal write-downs, servicers will be required to consider an alternative modification approach that emphasizes principal relief. This alternative modification approach will include incentive payments for each dollar of principal write-down by servicers and investors. The principal reduction and the incentives will be earned by the
borrower and lender based on a pay-for-success structure. (The government’s bribing everyone to save the housing market! Who’s going to make sure the banks do as they are required to?)
Other program enhancements are designed to help more borrowers complete a HAMP modification. Borrower outreach and communications rules will be clarified and strengthened to protect responsible borrowers from unnecessary and costly foreclosure actions and to expand modification opportunities for borrowers in bankruptcy. Servicers will receive increased incentives, allowing them to expand borrower outreach and counseling efforts. With the introduction of FHA-HAMP, the HAMP pay-for-success incentives will be expanded to include borrowers with FHA loans. (Our government is admitting that many banks haven’t been playing by the rules of HAMP and screwing with qualified homeowners. Now lenders will get more money to identify these same homeowners? )
For borrowers who continue to struggle and are unable to complete a modification, these program enhancements will help homeowners move to more affordable housing. Relocation assistance payments to borrowers who use the foreclosure alternatives program will be doubled and incentives will be increased for servicers and lenders to raise participation. (If they can’t modify your loan to allow you to stay, they’re going to try to get you to move faster to get the property back to the bank faster.)
Improvements to the Home Affordable Modification Program – More Help for Homeowners 1. Temporary assistance for unemployed homeowners while they search for re-employment:
Mortgage payments reduced to affordable level for a minimum of three months, and up to 6 months for some borrowers, while eligible homeowner looks for new job. (How many unemployed people do you know that have been able to find a new job in 3-6 months?)
2. Requirement to consider alternative principal write-down approach and increased principal write-down incentives:
All servicers required to consider alternative modification approach that emphasizes principal write-down with incentives based on the dollar value of the principal reduced
The principal reduction and the incentives will be earned by the borrower and investor based on a pay-for-success structure
(And if lenders don’t do as they’re required? Where are the penalties? This sounds great and makes it look like Obama cares, but HAMP sounded great when it was announced and it’s a failure.)
3. Improvements to reach more borrowers with HAMP modifications
Improvements to borrower solicitation requirements including clear performance timeframes for both servicers and borrowers and a prohibition against initiation of a new foreclosure referral when a borrower is cooperating with the servicer to obtain a modification(many homeowners are just going to use this to play the system and stay in their homes longer)
Borrowers in active bankruptcy must be considered for HAMP upon request
Increased incentives for servicers to provide permanent HAMP modifications (this is another admission that HAMP’s been a failure so far)
Expansion of HAMP to include homeowners with FHA loans
4. Helping homeowners move to more affordable housing (nice way of saying get your home back to the bank faster)
Relocation assistance payments to homeowners receiving foreclosure alternatives doubled
Increased incentives to servicers and lenders, including increased incentives for extinguishment of subordinate liens, to encourage more short sales and other alternatives to foreclosure Program Details (encourage short sales? Don’t they read anything on the internet or in the news about how hard lenders make short sales?)
1. Temporary Assistance for Unemployed Homeowners While They Search for Re-Employment
? Mortgage payments reduced to an affordable level for a minimum of 3 months, and up to six months for some borrowers, while eligible homeowner looks for new job.
Payment set at 31 percent of monthly income or less while homeowner is unemployed via forbearance plan. (they don’t say you can use unemployment income to qualify, so expect lenders to play games with that. Also notice the word forbearance, which just means tacked onto the end)
Temporary assistance plan offered for a minimum of 3 months, and up to six months for some borrowers, subject to investor and regulator guidelines, ending when borrower becomes re-employed or scheduled assistance period expires. Borrowers who become re-employed during the scheduled assistance period and whose mortgage payment is greater than 31 percent of their new gross monthly income must be considered for HAMP.
? Servicers participating in the Making Home Affordable Program are required to offer assistance to all unemployed borrowers who meet eligibility criteria:
Homeowner’s mortgage meets HAMP eligibility requirements, including 1) house is owner-occupied 2) loan balance is below $729,750 and 3) loan was originated before January 1, 2009.
Borrower submits evidence that they are receiving unemployment insurance (UI) benefits.
Borrower requests temporary assistance in the first 90 days of delinquency.
(there’s that word required again!)
? At the end of the temporary assistance period, homeowners who have a mortgage payment greater than 31 percent of their monthly income must be considered for a permanent HAMP modification.
To receive the permanent HAMP modification, homeowners must be current on assistance plan payments, must verify qualifying income with standard documentation, and must meet all other HAMP underwriting requirements including the net present value (NPV) evaluation.
Unemployment insurance will not be counted as income when homeowner is evaluated for HAMP. (so if you still don’t have a job, but were able to make all your payments on time using your unemployment income – you’re still screwed!)
If the scheduled assistance period ends without re-employment, the homeowner may be considered for HAMP alternatives to foreclosure including short sales and deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. (Hello! Like a homeowner will have any other options?)
? No cost to government or taxpayers from the forbearance plans. (But what about the loan mod and debt forgiveness plans?)
2. Requirement to Consider Alternative Principal Write-down Approach and Increased Principal Write-down Incentives
? Requirement for all servicers to consider an alternative modification approach including more principal writedown for HAMP-eligible borrowers that owe more than 115 percent of the current value of their home.
Servicers will be required to run the standard NPV and an alternative NPV that includes incentives for principal write-down and compare the results.
If NPV is higher under alternative approach, servicer will have option to use it.
(This just means that if the new Net Present Value calculation is higher than the old, your principal may be reduced. No new formula announced yet though. Why does it start out saying “required”, but end with “optional”?)
? Alternative principal reduction allows some underwater homeowners to reduce principal balance of their mortgage in steps over three years, if they remain current on payments.
Under alternative approach, servicers assess the NPV of a modification that starts by forbearing principal balance as needed over 115 percent loan-to-value (LTV) to bring borrower payments to 31 percent of income; if a 31 percent monthly payment is not reached by forbearing principal to 115 percent LTV, the servicer will then use standard steps of lowering rate, extending term, and forbearing additional principal.
Servicers will initially treat the write-down amount as forbearance and will forgive the forborne amount in three equal steps over three years, as long as the homeowner remains current on payments.
Additional guidance will address the treatment of second liens where applicable, which must also agree to first extinguish principal in conjunction with any principal reduction on the first lien.
(this is the most important part of the announcement. The plan is to only forgive principal amounts over 115% of your home’s current value – so you’ll still be upside down, just not as bad)
? For borrowers who have already received a permanent modification, or who are in a trial modification, and are still current on payments at the time the alternative modification approach is operational (later in 2010), servicers will be required to retroactively consider extinguishing an amount of principal balance in the same amount that would have been forgiven under the new alternative approach. (Yeah right, like lenders are going to ramp up enough staff to go back and redo old loan mods while still working on the new ones coming in?)
To further encourage principal write-downs, Treasury is also increasing the incentives that it provides for loans extinguished or partially extinguished in conjunction with the HAMP Second Lien Program.
The following schedule will be available to lenders in exchange for all principal write-downs under HAMP at the time of a loan modification.
Table: Extinguishment Price Schedule: Per Dollar of Unpaid Principal Balance (UPB) in Loan-to-Value (LTV) Range
LTV<115
115 < LTV < 140
LTV > 140
$0.21
$0.15
$0.10
All second liens that are greater than 6 months delinquent, regardless of LTV, will be paid at the rate of $0.06 (per loan dollar).
3. Improvements to Reach More Borrowers with HAMP Modifications(again they’re admitting lenders weren’t trying to help homeowners. Question is, if lenders weren’t following the old rules to help homeowners, why would they be expected to follow these new rules? It’s just more political smoke & mirrors to make it look like something’s being done just to placate voters)
? Improve borrower solicitation and communication and expand opportunities for borrowers in bankruptcy
Clarifies borrower solicitation requirements and defines “reasonable effort” on the part of the servicer to outreach to borrowers.
? Encourages early intervention by requiring pro-active solicitation of all borrowers who meet the HAMP eligibility profile and have missed two or more payments.
? Establishes minimum solicitation requirements that include both phone and mail attempts.
Prohibits referral to foreclosure until a borrower is evaluated and found ineligible for HAMP or reasonable contact efforts have failed, protecting responsible borrowers from unnecessary foreclosure actions and costs. (Ok, who’s going to verify the lender’s evaluation is correct? I know of several cases where they were flat out wrong!)
Requires servicers to stop foreclosure actions after a borrower enters into a trial plan based on verified income.
Requires written certification that a borrower is not HAMP eligible before an attorney or trustee can conduct a foreclosure sale. (Lenders are going to certify themselves?)
Establishes a 30-day borrower response period from the date of a non-approval notice during which foreclosure sale is prohibited.
Requires servicers to consider borrowers in bankruptcy for HAMP and removes barriers to HAMP evaluation.
? Allows use of bankruptcy documents to verify income.
? Allows waiver of the trial period in some cases were a borrower is already performing under a bankruptcy plan.
? Increase incentives for servicers to provide permanent modifications to homeowners
Upfront servicer incentive payments increased for permanent modification to allow servicers to increase outreach and counseling efforts and to cover costs of implementing the updated program elements.
? Implement FHA-HAMP, expansion of HAMP to include homeowners with FHA loans. (Uhm, FHA-HAMP was for homeowners with FHA loans. Does anyone in our government know what they’re doing?)
TARP funded incentives will be available to borrowers and servicers whose loans are modified under the FHA-HAMP guidelines. The incentives are comparable to the incentive structure of HAMP.
FHA-HAMP provides FHA insured borrowers with modified mortgage payments set at 31 percent of gross monthly income, similar to a HAMP modification.
To be eligible for FHA-HAMP incentives, servicers must sign an agreement with Treasury. (and if they don’t sign an agreement?)
4. Helping Homeowners Move to More Affordable Housing
? Increase incentives to provide more homeowners with foreclosure alternatives
Increase payoffs to subordinate lien holders who agree to release borrowers from debt to facilitate greater use of foreclosure alternatives including short sales or deeds-in-lieu. (Does this mean no more deficiency judgments?)
? The new payoff schedule allows servicers to increase the maximum payoff to subordinate lien holders to 6 percent of the outstanding loan balance and doubles from $1,000 to $2,000 the incentive reimbursement that is available to investors for subordinate lien payoffs, subject to an
overall cap of $6,000.
Increase servicer incentive payments from $1,000 to $1,500 to increase use of foreclosure alternatives and encourage additional outreach to homeowners unable to complete a modification.
? Double relocation assistance payment for borrowers successfully completing foreclosure alternative to $3,000
Help homeowners who use a short sale or deed-in-lieu to transition more quickly to housing they can afford.
In an attempt to protect homeowners from crooks, HUD recently announced PreventLoanScams.org.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
The number of companies offering Loan Modifications, with guarantees or success rate claims of 80% or more seems to be growing with the number of foreclosures.
Desperate homeowners are desperately believing that these companies will help them.
My advice is to run, don’t just walk, away from any individual or company that guarantees results for loan modifications and/or short sales.
I tell every and any client that retains me that I will strive to maximize their chances of success, but I can’t guarantee anything.
Here’s a copy of HUD’s press release below, you can read it at their website by clicking here:
HUD ADVANCES FIGHT AGAINST LOAN MODIFICATION SCAMS National Coalition Launches Online Scam Reporting Tool
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, in partnership with the Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network, today announced the launch of PreventLoanScams.org. “ Homeowners at risk of foreclosure can be easy prey for home loan modification scammers. Often, dishonest individuals lure vulnerable homeowners into foreclosure rescue scams by making false promises. Scammers frequently claim they can lower mortgage payments or stop the foreclosure process. ” “Troubled homeowners lose time and money when they are tricked by con artists who promise to help but never do,” said John Trasviña, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “This initiative combines the collective energies of public and private enterprises to strengthen the ability of law enforcement to prosecute scammers and protect homeowners.” The Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network, a national coalition of public and private enterprises, is led by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Homeownership Preservation Foundation, and NeighborWorks America assist the Lawyers’ Committee in leading the coalition’s fight against loan modification scams. The Network developed PreventLoanScams.org to provide homeowners with a single destination to report alleged scammers. Complaints filed online are added to a national complaint database and forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement agencies for review. The Network estimates that the website will assist approximately 50,000 homeowners affected by scams. Additionally, HUD has directed its local fair housing and housing counseling grantees to begin reporting alleged loan modification scams via the website. The creation of a national complaint database is a major step in the fight against loan modification scams. Prior to the launch of PreventLoanScams.org, federal, state, and local government agencies could not share complaint data with non-profit organizations. The new system allows for better analysis of trends across jurisdictional lines and will likely lead to an increase in private enforcement action filings.
Back in April 2008 Michigan Attorney General wrote an opinion on Michigan Transfer Tax exemptions.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
Here’s an excerpt:
“An exemption from the requirement imposed by the State Real Estate Transfer Tax Act, MCL 207.521 et seq, to pay state real estate transfer taxes upon the transfer or sale of real property may be claimed under MCL 207.526(t) if, on the date a parcel occupied as a principal residence is transferred, its state equalized value is less than or equal to its state equalized value on the date the owner purchased or acquired the parcel and the property is sold for not more than its true cash value at the time of sale.”
You can read the opinion letter for yourself by clicking here.
To summarize, a seller may be exempt from paying the state transfer tax if:
The property sold is their primary residence.
The sales price is less than twice the current SEV.
The SEV on the sale date is less than or equal to the SEV when the seller bought the property.
Here are three examples from the opinion:
EXAMPLE 1:
SEV when acquired in 2006 = $74,000.00.
SEV when transferred in 2008 = $72,000.00.
TCV in 2008 = $144,000.00.
Transfer or sale price in 2008 = $140,000.00.
OUTCOME: This transfer qualifies for exemption from the state real estate transfer tax because the SEV for 2008, the year of sale, is less than the SEV for 2006, the year of acquisition, and the sale price does not exceed the true cash value.
EXAMPLE 2:
SEV when acquired in 2006 = $74,000.00.
SEV when transferred in 2008 = $72,000.00.
TCV in 2008 = $144,000.00.
Transfer or sale price in 2008 = $148,000.00.
OUTCOME: This transfer is not exempt under MCL 207.526(t) because the sale price exceeds the true cash value for 2008, the year of sale.
EXAMPLE 3:
SEV when acquired in 2006 = $74,000.
SEV when sold in 2008 = $75,000.
OUTCOME: This transfer, regardless of the sale price, is not exempt under MCL 207.526(t) because the SEV for 2008, the year of sale, exceeds the SEV for 2006, the year of acquisition.
It’s important to note that this exemption does not cover the county transfer tax.
Also, it’s advised that a seller consult with an experienced real estate attorney.
It would be interesting if Realcomp (MLS service provider) could/would analyze 2009 sales for the tri-county area to determine the percentage of home sales that qualified for this exemption. I’m sure a high percentage of short sales did.
I’m also sure those in Lansing running the budget numbers haven’t taken this potential loss of revenue into account.
The question is – how many real estate agents are letting their clients know about this?
Shoring up loan losses seems to be the reason for this latest change, more may be coming this summer.
Michigan, Mortgage, Expert, Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Rochester, Royal Oak, Troy
The Department of Housing Urban Development (HUD) is moving forward with its plans to stem the losses in its Federal Housing Administration (FHA) program.
With concerns in Congress that HUD may need its own bailout, steps are being taken to generate more revenue to absorb the higher losses on foreclosures.
Starting April 5, 2010 all case numbers pulled for new loans will require an upfront MIP factor of 2.25%. Currently the factor is 1.75%, which was recently increased from 1.5%.
The 2.25% is what FHA’s upfront MIP factor was in the 1990’s before the Clinton administration had it reduced as HUD’s MIP insurance pool was flush with cash.
Also of note, the monthly MIP factor was recently increased from a 0.5% to 0.55% base.
What’s this mean for homebuyers?
If you’re getting a $100,000 loan, the upfront MIP changes mean an increase of $500 and the monthly change is an increase of $4.17/month.
It’s important to remember the upfront MIP is usually financed into the loan amount, so the monthly effect of the $500 increase in the above example will depend on the borrower’s interest rate.