|
|
August 14th, 2010
HUD announced adjustments to its Making Home Affordable initiative to encourage more principal reductions on August 6th. Soon after, rumors ran rampant on Wall Street and in the press that the Obama administration would be soon announcing that FNMA & FHLMC would be forgiving a portion of the principal owed on the trillions in mortgages they control. What’s going on?
Sometimes the best way to find out how a radical idea will be accepted, is to start your own rumor about it and see how everyone responds.
If someone in the Obama administration is playing this game, they got a lot of responses to digest.
Reuters, Barons & even Morgan Stanley weighed in on the rumor. The rumor spread so fast the Treasury Department supposedly felt compelled to issue a statement of denial (not that I could find it).
With the economy still not recovering, Obama’s approval ratings in the trash and the Democrats expecting to get skewered in the coming elections – might they actually try it?
Who knows, but it would be extremely difficult to implement with any kind of fairness.
HUD’s FHA Short Refinance Announcement
What we can talk about is the latest attempt by HUD to get banks to use its principal reduction program.
HUD’s first two attempts to leverage the promise of FHA mortgages to get banks to grant principal reductions didn’t work, maybe the third time’s the charm?
Ah, to have the eternal optimism of our government officials. They are so concerned about underwater homeowners that they keep searching for ways to get the banks to lower principal balances. They keep trying & trying!
Oh wait, they’re just doing this to keep their jobs!
Even better, HUD couldn’t even come up with a new program this time around. Instead they announced “adjustments” to their most recent failed program.
What’s it mean for homeowners?
Well if you’re upside down AND can convince your lender to forgive at least 10% of your loan balance, then you may qualify for this “FHA Short Refinance” option.
Has anyone at HUD taken the time to notice that banks can’t get up to speed on short sales or even foreclosures (shadow inventory)?
So, why does HUD think banks are going to embrace this program?
FHA Short Refinance Details
Even if you meet all the requirements below, I wouldn’t get your hopes up about getting your lender to approve you for this program.
This is pulled right from HUD:
Participation is voluntary and requires the consent of lien holders. In order for a loan to be eligible, the following conditions must be met:
1. The homeowner must be in a negative equity position;
2. The homeowner must be current on the existing mortgage to be refinanced;
3. The homeowner must occupy the subject property (1-4 units) as their primary residence;
4. The homeowner must qualify for the new loan under standard FHA underwriting requirements and possess a “FICO based” decision credit score greater than or equal to 500;
5. The existing loan to be refinanced must not be a FHA-insured loan;
6. The existing first lien holder must write off at least 10 percent of the unpaid principal balance;
7. The refinanced FHA-insured first mortgage must have a loan-to-value ratio of no more than 97.75 percent;
8. Non-extinguished existing subordinate mortgages must be re-subordinated and the new loan may not have a combined loan-to-value ratio greater than 115 percent;
9. For loans that receive a “refer” risk classification from TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard (TOTAL) and/or are manually underwritten, the homeowner’s total monthly mortgage payment, including the first and any subordinate mortgage(s), cannot be greater than 31 percent of gross monthly income and total debt, including all recurring debts, cannot be greater than 50 percent of gross monthly income;
10. FHA mortgagees are not permitted to use premium pricing to pay off existing debt obligations to qualify the borrower for the new loan;
11. FHA mortgagees are not permitted to make mortgage payments on behalf of the borrowers or otherwise bring the existing loan current to make it eligible for FHA insurance; and
12. The existing loan to be refinanced may not have been brought current by the existing first lien holder, except through an acceptable permanent loan modification as described below.
Anyone that’s attempted to get a loan modification already knows the difficulties in getting lenders to assist when you’re already behind on your mortgage. Imagine the challenge of getting assistance when you’re current on your mortgage?
Summary
I can only think of three reasons HUD officials would even bother announcing this new option:
- They’re trying to save their jobs by making it look like their doing something.
- This is just the first piece of a bigger strategy.
- They are truly incompetent
For more information on the HUD announcement:
FHA Short Refinance Announcement
HUD Mortgagee Letter 2010-23
Michigan, Mortgage, Expert, Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Rochester, Royal Oak, Troy
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Expert, fha, Michigan, Mortgage, principal reduction, Refinance, Rochester, Royal Oak, short, Troy Posted in FHA, FNMA, HUD, Housing, Refinance, Upside Down | No Comments »
July 13th, 2010
What are Michigan homeowners and homebuyers waiting for?
Check out this chart, compliments of my friendly neighborhood First American Title rep, Julia Halpin:)

Gadzooks & zounds! These historically low mortgage rates are record setters.
What more could a Michigan homeowner looking to refinance or a Michigan homebuyer looking to buy ask for?
How about appraisals coming in higher & a job to qualify to buy!
These historically low mortgage rates are a sign that our economy is not doing all that well:(
But, if your home can appraise or you do have a job, it’s a fantastic time to get a mortgage!
So, give our team a call.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Posted in Affordability, Purchase, Rates, Recovery, Refinance | No Comments »
May 31st, 2010

Should Borrowers care also?
A recent article I read online at a real estate blogging site called ActiveRain, brought out some interesting comments.
I was shocked after reading all the comments that most of the agents commenting seemed to endorse buyers shopping for a mortgage solely by price.
A couple of brave Loan Originators pointed out that LO’s could do the same thing to agents and recommend buyers & sellers shop solely for the agent willing to work for the lowest commission.
I don’t really see the tit-for-tat thing being constructive for either side.
Here’s the comment I posted:
I find it interesting that not one Realtor mentioned the experience and knowledge of a loan officer over price!
Hmmm, it seems the collective thoughts, of some of the best agents in the industry, are of the opinion that price is all that matters.
I can’t put into words how disappointed I am if this is truly the thought process of the brightest Realtor minds in this business.
The next time any of you want to complain about one of your deals not going smoothly or blowing up due to lender issues, just remember – the buyer shopped and got the best price, so everyone involved got what they deserved.
Not a very constructive comment either. I apologize as I was a bit steamed that the other half of our industry’s symbiotic relationship appears to think they could easily survive without experienced or knowledgeable LO’s.
That is the key to this debate. We’re all in this together. Each half needs the other to get paid.
I fully believe buyers should be shopping for the best deal. Rates & fees are only a small part of what makes up the best deal. The best rate & fees mean nothing if the deal doesn’t close due to incompetency.
So, do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
BTW – here’s a few of the responses by real estate agents to my post. Borrowers should note that they all endorse experience over lowest price:
|
Great post. There’s so much more than “the price.” Understandable that some of the comments were upsetting when you’re trying to do what’s best for the buyers. You are correct… we need each other!
|
|
|
|
|
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
_______________________________________________________________
If you enjoyed my blog post,
I invite you to connect with me on the social networks below & subscribe to my blog!

“Referrals are Sending Someone You Care about, to Someone You Trust!”
So, forward this blog post to someone that’ll appreciate it!
_______________________________________________________________
Drew Sygit: CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, MBA, NAMB/MAMP Instructor & Speaker
The most Certified Mortgage Expert in the Midwest
Contact him for The Lending Edge
P: 248-356-3739 • F: 866-215-3755 • dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com • www.TheLendingEdge.com
Tags: Birmingham, Bloomfield, Detroit, Expert, Michigan, Mortgage, Rochester, Royal Oak, Troy Posted in 1-TLE, Expert, First Time Buyer, Mortgage, Purchase, Rates, Refinance | No Comments »
April 3rd, 2010
If you’re an upside down Michigan homeowner that’s current on your non-FHA mortgage and you owe more than 115% of your home’s current value, FHA may have a deal for you!
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
The government is getting more serious about bailing out the housing industry with HUD’s latest announcement about the new FHA program.
It’s potentially good news for upside down Michigan homeowners, as to make a loan eligible for the program, the lender must write down the principal balance AND make sure the payment isn’t more than 31% of income.
The program is voluntary for lenders, but if the government can get enough lenders to actually participate this could finally be the program that stabilizes the housing market.
Here are some highlights of the program:
- Voluntary option for lenders and borrowers with mortgages NOT currently insured by FHA.
- Encourages lenders and borrowers to work together, when appropriate, to restructure debts.
- Loans must have a minimum writedown of 10% and all mortgages on a property total to less than 115% of the property’s current value.
- Eligible upside down Michigan homeowners are refinanced into new FHA-insured loans on standard FHA refinance terms for documentation, income ratios and complete underwriting.
- Terms of FHA refinancing:
- New FHA loan must be equal to no more than 97.75% of the current value of the property.
- Combined mortgage debt must be written down to a maximum of 115% of the current value of the home.
- Standard mortgage insurance premium structure will apply.
- Mandatory principal writedown as part of refinance.
- Minimum writedown by lender of at least 10% of the unpaid balance of the original loan.
- Reduced monthly mortgage payments to facilitate sustainable homeownership:
- Rate on refinanced loan will be set at prevailing FHA interest rate.
- Total monthly mortgage payment, including second mortgage, will not be greater than approximately 31% of gross monthly income.
- Total debt service including all forms of household debt will not be greater than approximately 50% of gross monthly income, except for some borrowers with especially strong credit histories.
- Existing lenders can retain their second mortgages on the property, but only up to a combined 115% of the current value of the home.
- If there is an existing mortgage that is not extinguished, lenders must agree to re-subordinate and extinguish any amount over 115% of the current value of the home.
- Homeowner Eligibility
- Homeowners must be current on their mortgage payments.
- Homeowner must occupy the home as their primary residence and fully document their income.
- Homeowners must qualify under standard FHA borrower guidelines.
- Homeowners must have a FICO credit score of at least 500.
- Existing lenders’ choice to consent for an FHA refinancing of this type is voluntary given the principal writedown requirement. Thus, not all homeowners who meet above criteria will receive an FHA refinanced loan.
- As with any loan forgiveness, the short refinancing will be reflected on borrowers’ credit score.
HUD plans to use up to $14 billion in TARP funding to support the FHA refinance options. The funds will be used to payoff second liens, provide incentives to servicers and provide coverage for some share of potential losses resulting from the newly refinanced loans.
Here’s an example provided by HUD:
Example of a Typical FHA Refinance
- In 2006: Family A took out a 30-year fixed mortgage with a balance of $250,000 and an interest rate of 9.0%. Their monthly payment was about $2,000 per month.
- Today: Home prices have dropped and Family A’s home is worth $180,000.
- With a FHA Refinance: Family A’s loan balance will be reduced to $207,000 and their monthly payment will fall to about $1300 per month. This will reduce their principal balance by about $33,000 and reduce their monthly payments by about $700 per month, saving the family nearly $42,000 over the next 5 years.
When will this all be available to upside down Michigan homeowners? HUD says,
“FHA will move to implement this as quickly as possible and expect that lenders can begin making decisions by the fall. Specific guidelines will be posted in a FHA Mortgagee Letter in the near future.”
You can read HUD’s press release about the program here, be sure to click on the links at the bottom for even more info.
Additional FAQs can be found at the Making Home Affordable website.
Posted in 1-TLE, FHA, Government, Recovery, Refinance, Upside Down | 5 Comments »
March 2nd, 2010
Another lukewarm attempt to help stabilize the housing market won’t do much.
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
Yesterday, Edward DeMarco with the Federal Housing Finance Agency announced that the program that allows homeowners to refinance their upside down homes would be extended.
Big deal.
When Obama announced the program, it was touted to be able to help 4-5 million homeowners refinance into lower rates and therefore be less likely to walk-away from their homes.
Initially, the program allowed homeowners to refinance up to 105% of their home’s current value.
After dismal response, the program was expanded to allow refinances up to 125%.
Apparantly those in the White House consulting the President on this program are clueless to what happens in the real world.
Soon after the 125% expansion was announced, FNMA announced they would charge a lot more for the program.
Also, there are severe problems with homeowners who have PMI or second loans (or lines of credit) on their homes. Trying to get a PMI company to reissue a new PMI certificate of getting a lender to resubordinate their second lien is a time consuming nightmare.
On top of that, in many hard hit states where upsde down homeowners could be helped the most, many homeowners owe more than 125% of their homes current value.
Come on President Obama, let’s see you step up and really do something to help upside down homeowners.
Posted in 1-TLE, Government, Housing Values, Refinance, Upside Down | No Comments »
November 21st, 2009
MORTGAGE, EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
I recently came across an interesting chart I thought I’d share, that shows mortgage rates often trend lower at the end of the year.

The data above was culled from FHLMC’s data that is published weekly. Please note, that this data also tracks the average points charged (0.7 points in the graph).
I’ve had many calls from rate shoppers so intent on finding the lowest rate, that they foolishly don’t take the time to understand the whole picture, nor listen to an expert (myself) trying to explain it. You can cure ignorance, but not stupidity.
Now, before you go planning on waiting to refinance until December 31st to get the lowest possible rate, remember that the past is not a reliable predictor of the future. Just look at our recent economic mess for proof of that – so called Wall Street experts based a lot of their actions on past market movements and look how that worked out.
Here’s a chart of Mortgage Backed Securities over the last 6 months:

In this graph, green is good and since this chart tracks PRICES, not rates, higher means lower rates.
As you can see, rates have been heading in a favorable direction since mid-October. They did though, have a slide at the end of September and were flat at the beginning of October.
The more technical of you will notice that prices have moved above their 25, 50, 100 & 200 day moving averages – typically a sign of a strong rally.
How long will rates stay low? Not much longer. The Federal Reserve is artificially holding rates low by buying Treasuries and Mortgage Backed Securities. They’ve announced their intentions to end these purchases by the end of March.

Look at the chart above. Rates started their dramatic improvement last fall when the Fed started their buying binge. Mortgage rates have improved by over 1% since then.
It’s not a stretch to anticipate they will increase by 1% when the Fed stops buying.
So, if you or anyone you know has a rate above 5.5%, give strong consideration to looking into refinancing now.
Just don’t make the mistake of waiting for the market to get where you want it and THEN applying for a mortgage. Chances are, it’ll take a day or two to get all the paperwork sorted so you can lock an interest in – and by then the rate could be gone.
# # #
In addition to real estate lending, consulting and investing, Drew Sygit writes & speaks about the mortgage & real estate industries. He holds mortgage industry designations CMPS, CMC, CRMS, CMLO, CALO, has an MBA and is an approved industry instructor. He’s presented, spoken and/or written for HUD, Financial Planning Association, Financial Planners Association of Michigan, Michigan Association of CPA’s, Institute of Continuing Legal Education, Oakland Real Estate Investors Association, North Oakland County Board of Realtors and numerous industry publications. For speaking engagements and questions he can be reached at dsygit@TheLendingEdge.com.
Tags: interest rate, Refinance Posted in 1-TLE, Expert, Mortgage Backed Securities, Rates, Refinance | 3 Comments »
November 3rd, 2009
After November 16th, HUD is making it a lot harder for borrowers to lower their mortgage payments through refinancing.
MORTGAGE EXPERT, MICHIGAN, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY
Once upon a time, in a land far, far away, HUD had some common sense. They allowed borrowers with FHA loans to easily refinance to lower their interest rate and payment.
Then came the too big to fail banks & Wall Street, that huffed and puffed and blew the housing market away.
All the Prez’s advisors and all the Prez’s yes men, haven’t been able to put it back together again.
You gotta smile and make light of the situation as it’s better than beating your head against a wall.
The FHA Streamline program has been around since the 1980’s. It allowed FHA borrowers to refinance their home loans with no appraisal, no income and no asset verification – a borrower just had to have made their last 12 months of payments on time.
The program made sense, as HUD was already on the hook for the loans if they defaulted, so why not make it less likely for these borrowers to default on their mortgages by making it easy to lower their rates and payments? Makes a lot of sense. VA does something similar for veterans, FNMA & FHLMC should have embraced this concept with the Obama Housing-O-Rama.
After November 16th though, HUD will now require income verification, asset verification, stricter payment histories and a borrower must have owned the home for a minimum of 6 months.
The worst change is that borrowers will no longer be able to roll closing costs or escrows into the new loan without a new appraisal.
How many more foreclosures do you think this will cause? Let’s see, you’re upside down in your home, you’re struggling to make your mortgage payments and now you can’t lower your payment to relieve some of this stress without bringing a boatload of cash to closing that you don’t have.
And our government is supposed to be protecting us and looking out for our best interests?
So why the change in policy?
Well, HUD feels there are too many streamline refi transactions being done that are not in the best interests of borrowers. I agree with that it’s happening as I’ve seen it and stopped several occurrences of it. There are still some bad/desperate players in the mortgage industry churning loans to fill their pockets. I just got a call today from a past client that was solicited on the phone for a FHA Streamline refi, being promised a 4.25% interest rate with “only” $6,000 in closing costs. My quick analysis showed her that it didn’t make sense. Talked myself out of a possible loan, but it wasn’t in her best interests. I’m hoping she trusts me that much more and will now refer me that much more often and strongly.
Oh by the way, have you seen the bonuses recently paid to the same “experts” on Wall Street that put the housing market into this mess?
Instead of trying to remove the few bad apples in the industry, HUD seems intent on throwing out the whole barrel of apples.
That seems to be our government’s new solution to every problem these days – instead of enforcing the laws already on the books to get rid of mortgage crooks, the Madoff Ponzi schemers and the Wall Street scoundrels, they just pass new laws that penalize everyone in entire industries.
Seems it’s a whole lot easier to pass new laws than to put your friends on Wall Street and bank leaders in jail where they belong.
Posted in 1-TLE, FHA, HUD, Mortgage, Refinance | 9 Comments »
October 19th, 2009
Mortgage programs that make a lot of sense are rendered basically useless by unpublished and unofficial modifications.
MORTGAGE EXPERT, DETROIT, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY, MICHIGAN
A quick update on my recent “Spank Your Bank” post, which has been one of my most commented posts ever. In no way did I mean to imply that the average worker at large banks should be held accountable for the cowardly/greedy actions of those in top management. Also, most smaller regional and community banks weren’t meant to be implied targets. They are actually alternatives to the “too big to fail” elitist banks. Nonprofits in Dire Need of Help Before I get into the post I wanted to introduce my audience to two wonderful Detroit based nonprofits that could use your help. Before you go hiding your wallet, Mariners Inn and Blight Busters are not asking for money (although they could always use more). They’re both looking for donations of supplies and volunteers. Mariners Inn is looking for auction items for its 21st annual River Rhythm fundraising event at the Roostertail on November 6. Blight Busters needs office equipment and supplies. They could also use volunteers to help redesign their website and build a social media presence. Check them out, they’re both struggling to do great things in Detroit in the face of reduced government and corporate funding. Of Politicians and Programs By now, thousands of homeowners should be benefiting from refinances that allow them to lower their payments. Lower payments mean fewer foreclosures, which supposedly is the goal of the Obama administration and many state governments. This is one of the reasons that FNMA/FHLMC now offers programs that allow a homeowner to refinance even if they owe more than their home is worth. FNMA/FHLMC already holds the mortgage and the corresponding inherent risk of any default by the homeowner, so why not lower that risk by allowing the homeowner to refinance to a lower payment? Makes too much sense not to do! HUD’s allowed that option on FHA loans for over 20 years with its Streamline Refinance program that didn’t require an appraisal or proof of income. All that’s changing now. HUD recently announced changes to its Streamline Refinance program effective November 18th, that will require homeowners to pay their closing costs or get an appraisal. Also, a lender must certify employment and income, which means lenders will verify it. FNMA/FHLMC’s first upside down refinance program worked pretty well. It allowed a homeowner to refinance up to 105% of their property’s value with only a slight bump in the going interest rate. They later rolled out a program allowing refinances on homes up to 125% upside down. This program has a dismal track record though, as FNMA/FHLMC requires such a high risk premium (higher interest rate) that for most homeowners, the program doesn’t make sense. So, we’ve got potentially great programs that President Obama and many politicians point to as evidence they’re doing all the can to help struggling homeowners, when in reality the programs are set up for failure behind the scenes. I doubt anyone on Obama’s team has ever taken the time to do the math and analyze how these programs work. If they did, they’d quickly see how useless they were. The most glaring example of this undercover manipulation of the lending system is FHA and credit scores. Search all you want at HUD.gov, you won’t find anything in writing about the requirements of credit scores to be eligible for an FHA mortgage. As I write this post though, most lenders now require a minimum credit score of 620 to qualify for an FHA mortgage. Several have recently bumped that requirement up to 640. What gives? HUD is passing on it’s dirty work to lenders to avoid political backlash that’s what. If HUD came out and publicly stated they were now requiring minimum credit scores, the political response would cost several HUD officials their jobs. But, these same officials are also being grilled by politicians and Wall Street about HUD’s increasing mortgage delinquencies. Fear is growing that the FHA program may need a federal bailout. That won’t sit well with anyone, but leaves HUD officials between a rock and a hard place. The only way to slow delinquencies and avert a bailout of the program is to do less riskier lending – but, that’s unpopular too. Politicians want votes, they don’t want to understand problems like this and have to make a decision that could hurt their career. So, politicians are indirectly forcing HUD officials into a solution that “unofficially” puts pressure on lenders for doing loans with credit scores under 620. Since there’s no official announcement, no one has to take the blame for an unpopular course of action. No one’s held accountable either. Avoiding accountability seems to be a popular survival strategy these days. Unfortunately, it just leads to mediocrity or worse. My Week Ahead Tomorrow, barring a last minute cancellation, I’m supposed to have lunch with Senator John Pappageorge to discuss the housing crisis in Michigan and my thoughts on possible solutions. I was quite surprised when his office called me about this. Tuesday I’ll be having lunch with Jeff Ivory, a financial planner who’s made several recent appearances on CNBC’s Squawk Box. Later I’m also getting together with a Leon Labrecque, a CPA and planner. Thursday I hope to pop into LBN’s Fall Mixer and then head over to the Troy Chamber of Commerce’s Golden Anniversary event. Friday morning I hope to attend Gerry Weinberg’s President’s Club.
Posted in 1-TLE, FHA, FHLMC, FNMA, Government, HUD, Refinance | 15 Comments »
October 11th, 2009
Banks bailed out of bankruptcy by the federal government, refuse to help out homeowners – so why do homeowners keep their accounts at these same banks?
MORTGAGE EXPERT, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, DETROIT, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY, MICHIGAN A recent federal report card through September on the results of the Making Home Affordable Program, shows real dismal progress. Despite 85% of eligible 60-day plus delinquent mortgages being covered by the 63 servicers pledged to participate in the federal government’s loan modification program, only 16% of eligible homeowners have been offered help. Now that is an improvement over July’s 9% and August’s 12% numbers, but at this rate it’ll be almost another year before banks are helping half of the eligible homeowners. Most will be foreclosed on by that time. What’s really interesting is comparing how much banks received in federal TARP bailout funds and how they’re “rewarding” the taxpayers that fronted the funds with loan modifications.
| BANK |
TARP Funds |
Percent Eligible Homeowners Assisted |
| Bank of America |
$45 Billion |
11% |
| Chase |
$25 Billion |
27% |
| Citibank |
$45 Billion |
33% |
| GMAC |
$12.5 Billion |
26% |
| PNC (bought National City) |
$7.7 Billion |
9% |
| Wells Fargo |
$25 Billion |
20% |
Bank of America is thumbing its nose at taxpayers the worst with a low 11% rate of assistance – all the more troubling as it’s the nation’s largest bank and still hasn’t paid back its borrowed TARP funds yet. The numbers above have greatly improved since July, but notice they only cover mortgages that are behind by 60 days or more? Obama’s wonderful promise to homeowners was that you DIDN’T have to be behind on your mortgage to qualify for a loan modification! I’m sure the numbers would look a lot worse if mortgages behind 30 days were added to the figures, much worse if every homeowner with a mortgage payments more than 31% of their gross income was added to the stats. By the way, that 31% number is what’s supposed to qualify a homeowner for Obama’s Making Home Affordable program. Now here’s the big question – know anyone with a mortgage at one of the above firms who’s trying to get a loan modification? If you do, ask that person how it’s going. Chances are they’ll tell you horror stories about paperwork getting lost multiple times, phone calls unanswered, conflicting advice and more. Do you think these banks really care about homeowners – that also happen to be taxpayers? As evidenced by their terrible track record with loan modifications, some banks don’t care one bit. We’re all less than pawns as far as their concerned. Now ask yourself, where do you have your checking and savings accounts? Why are you giving your business to these banks that show so little concern for Americans needing a break, when we the taxpayers gave them a break with our bailout tax dollars? Where’s the trickle down fairness? The, “do unto others as you’d have them do unto you?” If the banks wanted to play hardball with homeowners and tell them, “too bad about your financial difficulties, we’re foreclosing anyways”, then they shouldn’t have come begging for our tax dollars as TARP funds. We should have shown them as much mercy as they’re showing homeowners. We should have let tese banks fail. What goes around comes around guys! Unfortunately, it’s too late for that as they got their bailout funds, paid themselves bonuses for the mess they created and laughed all the way to their own bank accounts. We were suckers. We can still get back at these banks though. This is the official start of the “Spank the Banks” campaign. The only way we “itty-bitty” taxpayers can show these banks that they need to treat homeowners with more respect, is to take our business away from them. Spank your bank! I’m amazed when I find out that a homeowner trying to get a loan modification still has their accounts at the bank giving them the run around! Can you say “glutton for punishment”? These homeowners should Spank their Bank! How about showing some support for family & friends? If someone you care about is getting jerked around by their lender, spank that bank by making sure you close any accounts you have there. Now, who wants to start making, “Spank the Banks” t-shirts and bumper stickers?
Posted in 1-TLE, Deficiency Judgment, Distressed Property, Loan Modifications, Refinance, Short Sale, Upside Down | 13 Comments »
September 24th, 2009
To keep the program from needing a bailout in the future, HUD is acting quickly to lower the maximum principal limits by 10%.
MORTGAGE EXPERT, DETROIT, BIRMINGHAM, BLOOMFIELD, ROCHESTER, ROYAL OAK, TROY, MICHIGAN
On September 23, 2009, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development posted Mortgagee Letter 09-43, which announced a new set of principal limit factors for the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) program. The changes will lower the principal limits for the HECM by 10%.
According to the ML, the new principal limit factors must be used for all HECMs where the FHA case number is assigned on or after October 1, 2009.
So, all loans that currently have a case number or where one can be obtained prior to October 1, may be processed as usual.
What caused this sudden change?
It seems the HECM program, seemingly like everything else in this country, is in danger of needing a bailout in the future. This was brought to the attention of Congress when an estimated subsidy of $798 million appeared in President Obama’s fiscal 2010 budget. This was the first time in the history of the program that any subsidy had ever been requested. Both the Senate and the House responded quickly, passing bills requiring HUD to adjust the program to avoid requiring any subsidy from the government. As of yet, the Senate and House have not reached a compromise on the differences in their bills, but HUD’s surprise announcement shows they expect it to happen soon.
What caused the subsidy request? Several factors are affecting the stability of the HECM program:
? The continued drop in home prices is causing higher losses when HUD takes a property back after the demise of a borrower and has to sell the property to recapture the loan proceeds.
? Defaults are rising due to unpaid property taxes and home insurance.
? Record numbers of seniors are flocking to HECM’s due to financial distress and lenders ramping up their marketing of the program. Congress suspended the cap on the number of HECM’s HUD was authorized to insure back in 2006.
? Fraud continues to increase causing higher losses.
Industry experts estimate that if the new loan limit had been applied to current HECM’s already in place, nearly 21% of seniors would not have had enough funds to cover their debts – meaning theywouldn’t have been gotten their loans.
HUD’s also been discussing changes in the HECM program to address the property tax and insurance issue. They may require lenders to document that seniors have the ability to pay these items. If they don’t, additional proceeds may be affected to avoid these types of defaults.
So, if you know of anyone thinking of getting a reverse mortgage, tell them to apply ASAP before the new limits kick in.
Posted in 1-TLE, FHA, HUD, Refinance, Reverse | 1 Comment »
|